Future of D (page 9)

On Tuesday, 31 October 2023 at 16:17:54 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: > On 31/10/2023 11:50 PM, Atila Neves wrote: >> [...] > > Not particularly. I'll leave it to Paul to communicate the big stuff. > > Mine: https://github.com/Project-Sidero/basic_memory/tree/main/source/sidero/base/allocators > > Only things I'd change is dump TypeInfo in favor of my own thing, and allow getting rid of duplicative state (defensive programming). > >> [...] > > See that is concerning. That means you haven't done risk analysis yet. After all, having tables that were later manually modified (which they were) without the table generator is a ticking time bomb. That could stop dmd being released. Then I need more information from people who *do* know about the issue.

On 02/11/2023 10:54 PM, Atila Neves wrote: > Then I need more information from people who /do/ know about the issue. Okay, then we need to make a change to the PR managers roles. If they tell you that you need to review something, you actually have to review it and not just comment "I don't know". They are your backup plan. They determine if you need to be involved. They have already determined that the information is there to require you to put in the effort. This alone should prevent a repeat.

On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 12:54:33 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:

We are merging companies and our new product will be integrated in all our devices.

It's only been 4 days, and I've got varied responses. Both praise and criticism, which was expected.

I currently don't see any red flags or showstoppers for us using D in this project.

Is it complete? No.
Is it perfect? Also no.

But, it's good enough that we think it's better than C/C++, which would be the alternative. Everything can be compared on various dimensions of course. But our summary of the cold hard facts still shows that D is better.

Windows x64 and Linux arm64 are our main targets, and we haven't had any problems building for those (both on host and cross-compiling).

We will do this project in D, and we hope that things will continue as smoothly as it has so far.

We just want to say thanks to all contributors, big or small. There is no D without the community. A language is a living entity.

November 03

Re: Future of D

Posted by Imperatorn
in reply to IGotD-

Permalink

Imperatorn

Posted in reply to IGotD-

Permalink

On Friday, 3 November 2023 at 11:44:44 UTC, IGotD- wrote:

On Thursday, 2 November 2023 at 22:20:41 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:

I currently don't see any red flags or showstoppers for us using D in this project.

Is it complete? No.
Is it perfect? Also no.

Windows x64 and Linux arm64 are our main targets, and we haven't had any problems building for those (both on host and cross-compiling).

We will do this project in D, and we hope that things will continue as smoothly as it has so far.

We just want to say thanks to all contributors, big or small. There is no D without the community. A language is a living entity.

Is there an associated GUI with this program?

There's no direct gui for it. However, it will talk to a backend, then the FE guys will create a desktop application which consumes the API and presents stuff. So indirectly there is.

Forums