On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Jacob Carlborg wrote:

> On 2012-12-25 20:53, Brad Roberts wrote:
> 
> > More hardware would be nice, but isnt a
> > blocker for additional branch testing, software is.  Working on it over
> > the holidays.
> 
> Have you considered using any existing software for continues integration server?
> 
> We're using CruiseControl (the Ruby version) at work. It's simple and easy to setup and does what we need it to do.

I haven't done a survey in a while, but all of the ones I've looked at have lacked at least one of the features I've wanted to have.

  1) multi-platform
  2) great integration with github and pull requests
  3) ability to pull multiple repositories as a coordinated whole

and likely more, those are just off the cuff.

On 2012-12-27 00:09, Brad Roberts wrote:

> I haven't done a survey in a while, but all of the ones I've looked at
> have lacked at least one of the features I've wanted to have.
>
>    1) multi-platform
>    2) great integration with github and pull requests
>    3) ability to pull multiple repositories as a coordinated whole
>
> and likely more, those are just off the cuff.

Ok, I see.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg