On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 08:34:09 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 08:22:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>>
>> there's no guarantee GC allocated memory will _ever_ have their destructor ran, it's part of the spec.
>
> That would be very unfortunate, they have to either be called eventually or never called.  I find no such description in the "spec":
>
> http://dlang.org/garbage.html
>
> «5. Freeing all GC allocated memory that has no active pointers to it and do not need destructors to run.
>
> 6. Queueing all unreachable memory that needs destructors to run.
>
> 7. Resuming all other threads.
>
> 8. Running destructors for all queued memory.»

http://dlang.org/class.html#destructors

On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 08:41:04 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>
> http://dlang.org/class.html#destructors

Oh well, that should be described under GC too then, but it can improve collection speed so I guess it is ok if one requires classes to be marked @nogc if they have destructors.

The inbetween position is just dangerous.