Menu
Search

Forums

Forum Index

Thread overview
Regression or bugfix?
Sep 22, 2013
simendsjo
Sep 22, 2013
simendsjo
Sep 23, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
September 22, 2013
Gravatar of simendsjoPosted by simendsjoReply
simendsjo
Gravatar of simendsjo


Reply
In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head, it's "T!int".
Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".

So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?
September 22, 2013
Gravatar of simendsjoPosted by simendsjo
in reply to simendsjo		Reply
simendsjo
Gravatar of simendsjo
Posted in reply to simendsjo


Reply
On Sunday, 22 September 2013 at 13:50:00 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
> In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head, it's "T!int".
> Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".
>
> So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?

Added a ticket so it doesn't get lost: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11100
September 23, 2013
Gravatar of Jacob CarlborgPosted by Jacob Carlborg
in reply to simendsjo		Reply
Jacob Carlborg
Gravatar of Jacob Carlborg
Posted in reply to simendsjo


Reply
On 2013-09-22 15:49, simendsjo wrote:
> In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head, it's "T!int".
> Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".
>
> So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?

Apparently you shouldn't rely on the format of .stringof. See the comment the ones that follow:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10722#c4

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg