Thread overview
[Issue 11810] New: std.stdio.byLine/readln performance is very bad
Dec 24, 2013
Peter Alexander
Dec 24, 2013
Dejan Lekic
Dec 24, 2013
Peter Alexander
Dec 24, 2013
Artem Tarasov
Feb 28, 2014
Nick Treleaven
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810

           Summary: std.stdio.byLine/readln performance is very bad
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Phobos
        AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: peter.alexander.au@gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> 2013-12-24 04:34:29 PST ---
std.stdio.readln (and hence byLine) use repeated calls to fgetc() to find the
new line characters. This is a very inefficient way to read files (lots of
per-byte overhead).

I have a version of byLine that reads the files in 4kb chunks and then does the new line search. It is 6 times faster than byLine on my machine on a 10MB file (OSX 10.8.5, x64 2GHz MacBook).

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810


Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dejan.lekic@gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic@gmail.com> 2013-12-24 04:42:03 PST ---
It has been discussed on IRC hundreds of times and we all agreed that if
developer wants performance (s)he would read page-size chunks. That is why we
have byChunk(size_t) in std.stdio, I believe. :)

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810



--- Comment #2 from Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> 2013-12-24 05:27:14 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It has been discussed on IRC hundreds of times and we all agreed that if
> developer wants performance (s)he would read page-size chunks. That is why we
> have byChunk(size_t) in std.stdio, I believe. :)

OK, but:

1. It's non-trivial to implement byLine on top of byChunk.

2. Why would you want byLine to be slow? I'm not seeing the advantage of keeping byLine as it is. Fixing it doesn't change the API and has no downsides other than requiring a bit extra memory for the buffer.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810


bearophile_hugs@eml.cc changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bearophile_hugs@eml.cc


--- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-12-24 10:08:13 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It has been discussed on IRC hundreds of times and we all agreed that if
> developer wants performance (s)he would read page-size chunks. That is why we
> have byChunk(size_t) in std.stdio, I believe. :)

This is not acceptable. byLine is a very commonly used function (far more than byChunk in script-like D programs) and it should be sufficiently fast.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810


Artem Tarasov <lomereiter@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lomereiter@gmail.com


--- Comment #4 from Artem Tarasov <lomereiter@gmail.com> 2013-12-24 10:47:16 PST ---
+1

There's also this implementation: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.general/117750

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 24, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810



--- Comment #5 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-12-24 13:11:31 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1305)
byLineFast with small changes

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 26, 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810



--- Comment #6 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-12-26 14:23:27 PST ---
The whole point of byLine is to be a convenient API for user code to read lines from a file. It should not be constrained to using fgetc() just because we can't predict line length in advance. It should be built on top of a buffering mechanism (maybe byChunk) so that it offers good performance to a very commonly-used user operation. I highly recommend Peter Alexander to submit the improved byLine implementation to Phobos.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
February 28, 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11810


Nick Treleaven <ntrel-public@yahoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ntrel-public@yahoo.co.uk


--- Comment #7 from Nick Treleaven <ntrel-public@yahoo.co.uk> 2014-02-28 08:55:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=1305) [details]
> byLineFast with small changes

BTW I'm working on porting this to std.stdio.byLine, I'll submit a PR when finished.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------