July 16, 2014
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 06:56:24 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700
> Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly.
> oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
>
>> Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei
> have no motivation. and no, i'm neither using github, nor planning to
> use it in the current millenia. that's why i'm saying that
> issues.dlang.org is just a dust collector: no guthub pull request? your
> bug will sit in issues.dlang.org for indefinite time.
>
> so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed
> to stop frustrating people.

issues.dlang.org is primarily for discussing bugs, github pull requests are for reviewing fixes. Moving to github has a been a great success, but it lacks a lot of the features of bugzilla (issues.dlang.org) that are important for bug tracking, hence the split. Github, however, is *much* better for reviewing patches.
July 16, 2014
On 16/07/14 00:40, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> Binaries are located here:
>...

None of these links appear to work for me. (And this time I can't blame the Chinese firewall.)

L.
July 16, 2014
Hmmmm... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that.

Binaries are located here:

    ALL
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.zip

    FREEBSD

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.freebsd-32.zip

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.freebsd-64.zip

    LINUX
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.linux.zip
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd_2.066.0~b4-0_i386.deb
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd_2.066.0~b4-0_amd64.deb

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/libphobos2-66_2.066.0~b4-0_i386.deb

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/libphobos2-66_2.066.0~b4-0_amd64.deb

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.fedora.i386.rpm

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm

http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm

    OSX
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.osx.zip
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.dmg

    WINDOWS
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.windows.zip
    http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0-b4.exe

July 16, 2014
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:56:14 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your
> report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result
> will be the same.
>
> i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in
> compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation
> to report. did i mention that i have fixes too?
>
> but it's ok, spice must flow, new releases must be done.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336
July 16, 2014
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 09:32:42 UTC, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
>>
> Then paste the fix here and allow somebody else to do the boring PR stuff for you.
>
> Just saying "I've got a fix but not sharing" sounds childish.

Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest demonstrating the error.
July 16, 2014
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:43 +0000
Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d-announce
<digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest demonstrating the error.
test is in bugzilla, but it's not formatted as unittest, just as standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really sorry.


July 16, 2014
On 16/07/14 14:34, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really sorry.

It's fine, I can create the PR for you, but I haven't ventured into the backend before, so your fix would be appreciated. You'll get the credit as well, of course.
July 16, 2014
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:53:07 +0200
Lionello Lunesu via Digitalmars-d-announce
<digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> It's fine, I can create the PR for you
there is one already, but without tests: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336

> You'll get the credit as well, of course.
i don't care about credits, especially for such trivial fix. consider that code as Public Domain or WTFPL.


July 16, 2014
On 7/15/14, 11:42 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700
> Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly.
> oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
>
>> Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei
> have no motivation. and no, i'm neither using github, nor planning to
> use it in the current millenia.

I'm sure you have your reasons. The problem with an attitudes like this is they're a proxy for further and larger difficulties in working with a person. We're shorthanded enough to not pander to such. If you go to any OSS community, each has a way of doing things and can't possibly be accepting of anyone's idiosyncrasies.

> that's why i'm saying that
> issues.dlang.org is just a dust collector: no guthub pull request? your
> bug will sit in issues.dlang.org for indefinite time.
>
> so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed
> to stop frustrating people.

There would be a lot more frustration if the tracker didn't exist. It seems you're not willing to look beyond one bug report that's not two months old. There's a lot of activity going on.


Andrei

July 16, 2014
On 7/15/14, 11:49 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 +0000
> uri via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about
>> your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix?
> one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in
> bugtracker, collecting dust. maybe after it will be reviewed i'll find
> some motivation to fill another ticket... in a month... or two... or
> six...

Our release czar converted it to a pull request:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336

You should add unittests to your fix. I've approved this one but the best way to go if you want to be happy in this community is to get over yourself.


Andrei