Menu
Search

Forums

Forum Index

Thread overview
Open source Windows debugger
Jul 27, 2014
Walter Bright
Jul 27, 2014
Vladimir Panteleev
Jul 27, 2014
Martin Krejcirik
Jul 27, 2014
John Colvin
Jul 28, 2014
Walter Bright
July 27, 2014
Gravatar of Walter BrightPosted by Walter BrightReply
Walter Bright
Gravatar of Walter Bright


Reply
http://x64dbg.com/#start

Anyone want to give this a whirl?
July 27, 2014
Gravatar of Vladimir PanteleevPosted by Vladimir Panteleev
in reply to Walter Bright		Reply
Vladimir Panteleev
Gravatar of Vladimir Panteleev
Posted in reply to Walter Bright


Reply
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://x64dbg.com/#start
>
> Anyone want to give this a whirl?

It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or any supported debug information formats. I'd guess that it would not be great at debugging your own programs.
July 27, 2014
Gravatar of francesco cattoglioPosted by francesco cattoglio
in reply to Vladimir Panteleev		Reply
francesco cattoglio
Gravatar of francesco cattoglio
Posted in reply to Vladimir Panteleev


Reply
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:39:53 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> http://x64dbg.com/#start
>>
>> Anyone want to give this a whirl?
>
> It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or any supported debug information formats. I'd guess that it would not be great at debugging your own programs.

Yep, I have to agree.
Or well, probably it's good enough for Walter, but I would be utterly unable to debug even 50 lines of code with that :-P
July 27, 2014
Gravatar of Martin KrejcirikPosted by Martin Krejcirik
in reply to francesco cattoglio		Reply
Martin Krejcirik
Gravatar of Martin Krejcirik
Posted in reply to francesco cattoglio


Reply
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:50:14 UTC, francesco cattoglio wrote:
> Yep, I have to agree.
> Or well, probably it's good enough for Walter, but I would be utterly unable to debug even 50 lines of code with that :-P

It should be usable, if you convert your debug information to PDB format using cv2pdb tool. At least ollydbg shows the source correctly.
July 27, 2014
Gravatar of John ColvinPosted by John Colvin
in reply to Vladimir Panteleev		Reply
John Colvin
Gravatar of John Colvin
Posted in reply to Vladimir Panteleev


Reply
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:39:53 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> http://x64dbg.com/#start
>>
>> Anyone want to give this a whirl?
>
> It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the advertised features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, as I see no mention of source-level debugging, or any supported debug information formats. I'd guess that it would not be great at debugging your own programs.

It does make for a nice disassembler though :)
July 28, 2014
Gravatar of Walter BrightPosted by Walter Bright
in reply to Vladimir Panteleev		Reply
Walter Bright
Gravatar of Walter Bright
Posted in reply to Vladimir Panteleev


Reply
On 7/27/2014 1:39 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:07:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> http://x64dbg.com/#start
>>
>> Anyone want to give this a whirl?
>
> It looks like an open-source clone of OllyDbg. Looking at the advertised
> features, it seems to be aimed at reverse engineering, as I see no mention of
> source-level debugging, or any supported debug information formats. I'd guess
> that it would not be great at debugging your own programs.

It did mention PDB on one page. But not Codeview.