https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17379

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@yahoo.com> ---
I'm OK closing it. The only reason (I think) I reopened is because technically, simplifying the mangling can still reduce further the symbol names. So even though this is not a critical problem any more, there is still some juice that could potentially be squeezed out of this.

On the other hand, putting the type in the template space instead of inside the function achieves the same thing, so maybe it's not important enough to deal with this.

--