https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397

--- Comment #11 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #10)
> Combination of prefix attribute and contextual keyword feature will cause
> ambiguity.
> I think just only postfix cases should be accepted.

and my patch description clearly says that it's only for "postfix function attributes". ;-)

i strongly believe that we should deprecate and kill prefix attributes anyway.

one thing i did wrong is supporting for `nogc {}` and `nogc:` — i should check for '{' and ':' before deciding if 'nogc' is identifier or attribute. have to fix my patch.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397

Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #1395|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #12 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
Created attachment 1398
  --> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1398&action=edit
postfix function attributes w/o '@' (better code, allows nogc {} and nogc:)

fixed patch. now Kenji's sample is OK.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397

Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #1398|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #13 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
Created attachment 1399
  --> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1399&action=edit
postfix function attributes w/o '@' (better code, allows nogc {} and nogc:)

fixed patch yet again. forgot to change Parser::skipAttributes().

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13397

Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzilla@thecybershadow.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzilla@thecybershadow.net> ---
Such language changes need to be proposed through the DIP process:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs

Bugzilla is not the correct place for language enhancements. Without a DIP, this patch will not be accepted, so there's no point in keeping this issue open.

--