October 24, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Saaa | Saaa wrote: > That website needs a whole overhaul. I agree. It would be nice if Walter had someone else (perhaps u) maintaining the website long term, making it look pretty. That would do a lot for attracting new users. Hopefully that would give Walter more time to focus on D. I'm sure we could find someone, half the people in this forum maintain there own websites anyway. > The ubuntu website might be a good example. > Emphasis on the 'stable 1.0' and the 'experimental 2.0' as well on how to get it working are essential on the frontpage. > > I'd love to help out if necessary. |
October 24, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Saaa | Saaa wrote: > That website needs a whole overhaul. > The ubuntu website might be a good example. > Emphasis on the 'stable 1.0' and the 'experimental 2.0' as well on how to > get it working are essential on the frontpage. > > I'd love to help out if necessary. > > Agree++ -- Andrea[Cif]Agosti http://www.linkedin.com/in/aagosti |
October 25, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alexander Panek | On 10/24/07, Alexander Panek <alexander.panek@brainsware.org> wrote: > Walter, no offense, but I think pointing digitalmars.com/d/ directly to the D 2.x specification is a Bad Thing(tm), not to say stupid, marketing-wise. I keep reading comments about D being unstable and hard to use and whatnot, even though D 1.x is totally stable and great already! > > I would rather want to see a big "See D 2.0 (experimental branch)" somewhere on the home page, than having to click "1.0" for the stable branch. This makes no sense; we want to attract new users actually, no? > > Best regards > -- > Alexander Panek <alexander.panek@brainsware.org> > votes++; Anders |
October 25, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alexander Panek | One fine example: http://programming.reddit.com/info/5yznx/comments/c02b0d6 might also be an indication that the GDC pages need clarification. |
October 26, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Chris Miller | On 10/26/07, Chris Miller <chris@dprogramming.com> wrote:
> One fine example:
> http://programming.reddit.com/info/5yznx/comments/c02b0d6
> might also be an indication that the GDC pages need clarification.
That Tommstein guy is just trolling...
Anders
|
October 26, 2007 Re: D website pointing to 2.0, not 1.0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Anders Bergh | Anders Bergh wrote:
>> might also be an indication that the GDC pages need clarification.
>
> That Tommstein guy is just trolling...
It would be great if the D 1.0 specification could be released though,
now that all work is being done on the next version of the language ?
--anders
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation