June 11, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brandon Ragland | On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 00:20:12 UTC, Brandon Ragland wrote: > Just curious who thinks what IDE is best? I am a fan of my development. ide5 - is simple and predictable... https://vk.com/vk_dlang?z=photo-69995155_418926521%2Fwall-471951_1254 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuOl-4g117E |
June 17, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brandon Ragland | On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 00:20:12 UTC, Brandon Ragland wrote:
> Just curious who thinks what IDE is best?
>
> I don't think any IDE is perfect, and I've been using Eclipse with DDT and have been having a good time with it. However I don't particularly like Eclipse much, and was wondering what others though?
>
> I don't use Windows myself so I couldn't use VisualD or anything like that or try it out.
>
> -Brandon
I use Emacs with D mode and ansi-term, as well as completion.
|
July 04, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brandon Ragland | I'm using Intellij IDEA with Kingsley's D plugin. On a slightly related note has anyone read about Language Server Protocol (https://github.com/Microsoft/language-server-protocol)? Currently planned to be supported by Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Che. It's intended to be independent of any IDE so if D support is implemented then it'll be available to any IDE/test editor that can understand the protocol. |
August 07, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to MGW | On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:37:58 UTC, MGW wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 00:20:12 UTC, Brandon Ragland wrote:
>> Just curious who thinks what IDE is best?
>
> I am a fan of my development. ide5 - is simple and predictable...
>
> https://vk.com/vk_dlang?z=photo-69995155_418926521%2Fwall-471951_1254
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuOl-4g117E
Further development (new version) ide5 on the basis of Qt-5
|
August 07, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to MGW | On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 06:05:42 UTC, MGW wrote: > On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:37:58 UTC, MGW wrote: Further development (new version) ide5 on the basis of Qt-5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBan5Dwt_JM github.com/MGWL/QtE5 |
August 21, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to karabuta | Was wondering if anyone knows if there is an ide/editor that actually implements the "go to definition" feature? I find that is probably one of the most useful features to have, especially helps with learning how code works. By being able to simply click on a variable or type and see where it was defined and such. |
August 21, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John | On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 08:35:56 UTC, John wrote:
> Was wondering if anyone knows if there is an ide/editor that actually implements the "go to definition" feature? I find that is probably one of the most useful features to have, especially helps with learning how code works. By being able to simply click on a variable or type and see where it was defined and such.
Visual D has that feature. It works very well ( although it won't differentiate between functions overloads )
|
August 21, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John | On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 08:35:56 UTC, John wrote:
> Was wondering if anyone knows if there is an ide/editor that actually implements the "go to definition" feature? I find that is probably one of the most useful features to have, especially helps with learning how code works. By being able to simply click on a variable or type and see where it was defined and such.
All of them have this feature... > <
|
August 22, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to jkpl | On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 11:45:13 UTC, jkpl wrote:
> On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 08:35:56 UTC, John wrote:
>> Was wondering if anyone knows if there is an ide/editor that actually implements the "go to definition" feature? I find that is probably one of the most useful features to have, especially helps with learning how code works. By being able to simply click on a variable or type and see where it was defined and such.
>
> All of them have this feature... > <
Not all of them do, I tried a bunch yesterday and none of them had it. I was able to get vs code working with code-d, which I had to add the stdlib path to manually. I did want to use Atom though, looking at the plugins there though it seems none of them are maintained anymore.
|
August 22, 2016 Re: Best IDE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John | On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 00:37:31 UTC, John wrote:
> On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 11:45:13 UTC, jkpl wrote:
>> On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 08:35:56 UTC, John wrote:
>>> Was wondering if anyone knows if there is an ide/editor that actually implements the "go to definition" feature? I find that is probably one of the most useful features to have, especially helps with learning how code works. By being able to simply click on a variable or type and see where it was defined and such.
>>
>> All of them have this feature... > <
>
>
> Not all of them do, I tried a bunch yesterday and none of them had it. I was able to get vs code working with code-d, which I had to add the stdlib path to manually. I did want to use Atom though, looking at the plugins there though it seems none of them are maintained anymore.
Yeah...most of the time you must add the path to the libraries somwhere and also sometimes RTFM ;) But essentially Visual-D has, Mono-D has, Coedit has, code-d has, dlang-ide has, etc...
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation