September 06, 2015 Re: Current state of GUI's | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to motaito | On 06/09/15 11:43 AM, motaito wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 19:13:12 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> It links now when I manged to install all the dependencies, but it
>> doesn't run :(. Segfaults for some reason, I haven't looked in to it.
>
> Bummer... However, I appreciate that you are giving it a shot!
>
> But you see my point. An out of the box solution like QT would be worth
> gold. That's the one thing Microsoft got right. They have awesome
> developer tools. Or in the words of Steve Ballmer: "Developers!
> Developers! Developers!" :)
>
> Instead of loosing time you could just focus on building some software.
> Imagine D would have a kick ass IDE like visual studio but cross
> platform like QT. Productivity, efficiency and performance in one. Too
> bad D doesn't have the option for paid developers to create something
> like this. It's just too much work for your spare time. So, it's
> unlikely to happen any time soon :(
>
> Still, I very much appreciate people like Rikki Cattermole who builds a
> base to work of for others. The problem is for a few individuals that
> just takes a long time to complete.
I would very much appreciate people helping out.
E.g. Contributing manipulation functions, image loader / exporter.
Most importantly unittests. Fix bugs.
I'll most likely do the PNG test case infrastructure, but it would make things go a few months faster if somebody took ownership of testing in general.
I'll also be creating a TODO list for what needs to happen with Phobos. E.g. @nogc version of std.string:indexOf. So plenty of places anybody can jump in and help :)
|
September 06, 2015 Re: Current state of GUI's | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to motaito | On 2015-09-06 01:43, motaito wrote: > Bummer... However, I appreciate that you are giving it a shot! > > But you see my point. An out of the box solution like QT would be worth > gold. That's the one thing Microsoft got right. They have awesome > developer tools. Or in the words of Steve Ballmer: "Developers! > Developers! Developers!" :) > > Instead of loosing time you could just focus on building some software. > Imagine D would have a kick ass IDE like visual studio but cross > platform like QT. Productivity, efficiency and performance in one. Too > bad D doesn't have the option for paid developers to create something > like this. It's just too much work for your spare time. So, it's > unlikely to happen any time soon :( Yeah, I completely agree. > Still, I very much appreciate people like Rikki Cattermole who builds a > base to work of for others. The problem is for a few individuals that > just takes a long time to complete. That's also why I work on DWT and not a custom library. It's a port of SWT to D. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
September 06, 2015 Re: Current state of GUI's | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rikki Cattermole | On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 02:27:42 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> I would very much appreciate people helping out.
> E.g. Contributing manipulation functions, image loader / exporter.
>
> Most importantly unittests. Fix bugs.
> I'll most likely do the PNG test case infrastructure, but it would make things go a few months faster if somebody took ownership of testing in general.
>
> I'll also be creating a TODO list for what needs to happen with Phobos. E.g. @nogc version of std.string:indexOf. So plenty of places anybody can jump in and help :)
I can imagine that you could need help. With work and private projects I am pretty much max out already for the foreseeable future. That's also why I was hoping that D already has the tool, to speed up the process. I hope you find someone though!
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation