On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested all sub-domains before uploading.  Release archive is not looking well.
>
> http://downloads.dlang.org/

Wow. Man I don't want to be too harsh, but that was pretty lame. I mean... put the site on the air without testing?

JohnCK.

On 10.01.2016 21:50, mate wrote:
> I have one issue with icons display on my laptop, although they display
> well on my phone:
> http://imgur.com/lZWgWI4
> http://imgur.com/KZWBiVr
>
> Usually this kind of issues is due to my use of script blocker, but
> disabling it and reloading the page does not seem to fix it.
>
> Any idea?

The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on their examples page?

https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic

Also, what browser are you using, and what operating system?

On 10.01.2016 18:02, Saurabh Das wrote:
> On the font used, Roboto Slab: I feel that the serif nature of the font
> makes it clash with the clean design. A sans serif font would look much
> better.

At first I felt so, too, but the font grew on me. I think it works well.

> "Your Code Here" widget
> -----------------------------
[...]
> I suggest displaying the first 7-9 lines of code in the box and either
> making the box scrollable, or making it so that clicking on the box
> expands it to show the entire code.

I'd rather just put a hard limit on the length of examples. But scrollable/expandable code would be better than a large empty void below the download button.

> The "Sort lines" example is about the right size. The "Round floating
> point numbers" is a bit large.

I agree that "Round floating point numbers" is a tad too long. I think it's in an acceptable area, though.

> The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on their examples page?
>
> https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic

Yes.

> Also, what browser are you using, and what operating system?

Firefox 43.0.3, on linux (Fedora).

On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 15:23:53 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> On 10.01.2016 16:11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Do you have a PR in place yet?
>
> Here we go:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1187

This looks gorgeous. Congratulation to our @anonymous contributor!

On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:46:03 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested all sub-domains before uploading.  Release archive is not looking well.
>>
>> http://downloads.dlang.org/
>
> Wow. Man I don't want to be too harsh, but that was pretty lame. I mean... put the site on the air without testing?
>
> JohnCK.

Note that this url shouldn't even exist: the link on the main page for the download section points to http://dlang.org/download.html . I believe it is a left-over from a previous version.

On 10.01.2016 19:04, Saurabh Das wrote:
> What is the canonical way to report bugs on the website?

Website bugs go into the same bug tracker as compiler and library bugs:

https://issues.dlang.org/

Select "dlang.org" for component.

> On mobile, the red "your code here" merges with the code itself.

Yeah, that's not good. I'm not sure what the best fix for this would be. Do you have anything in mind?

On 10.01.2016 23:03, cym13 wrote:
> Note that this url shouldn't even exist: the link on the main page for
> the download section points to http://dlang.org/download.html . I
> believe it is a left-over from a previous version.

downloads.dlang.org is linked from download.html ("Release Archive"). So yeah, we dropped the ball on that one.

On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:58:19 UTC, mate wrote:
>> The icons are done using FontAwesome. Do the icons work on their examples page?
>>
>> https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#basic
>
> Yes.
>
>> Also, what browser are you using, and what operating system?
>
> Firefox 43.0.3, on linux (Fedora).

Your browser is probably blocking maxcdn's connection.
Do you happen to use a host-level adblocker by chance?

On 10.01.2016 22:18, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have tested all
> sub-domains before uploading.  Release archive is not looking well.
>
> http://downloads.dlang.org/

Uhm, where can I fix that? downloads.dlang.org isn't part of the of dlang.org repository, is it?