"Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:op.vygm6auqeav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>
> 1f is one character shorter :P  (BTW, not sure the grammar currently supports this one, even though it compiles. I think:
>
> Integer FloatSuffix
>
> should be added.
>
> I admit, there is no equivalent for real, since L is dual-purposed.
>
> -Steve

I didn't even know that existed!  Does it work in C?

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:22:40 -0400, Daniel Murphy <yebblies@nospamgmail.com> wrote:

> "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:op.vygm6auqeav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>>
>> 1f is one character shorter :P  (BTW, not sure the grammar currently
>> supports this one, even though it compiles. I think:
>>
>> Integer FloatSuffix
>>
>> should be added.
>>
>> I admit, there is no equivalent for real, since L is dual-purposed.
>>
>> -Steve
>
> I didn't even know that existed!  Does it work in C?

No, but I don't see why D has to be exactly the same as C :)

It's probably a bug, but it certainly makes sense to me to allow it, even if it's only useful for certain types.  I can't see an ambiguity with it.

-Steve