Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
wrapSocket for socket_t? As wrapFile for FILE*
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Adam D. Ruppe
Feb 14, 2016
tcak
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Ali Çehreli
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Beginner-8
Feb 14, 2016
Ali Çehreli
Feb 15, 2016
Beginner-8
February 14, 2016
Hi!

Anyone seen Socket constructor which uses already available socket of socket_t type?

I am need to use already connected socket imported from C library without closing them after using.
February 14, 2016
On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 04:13:12 UTC, Beginner-8 wrote:
> Anyone seen Socket constructor which uses already available socket of socket_t type?


See the list on my unofficial docs here:

http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.socket.Socket.html

This one does it:

http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.socket.Socket.this.5.html




or the official docs here:

http://dlang.org/phobos/std_socket.html#.Socket.this.3


But basically you can just do:

   auto socket = new Socket(your_socket_t, AddressFamily.INET); // or whatever it is


AddressFamilies are:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.socket.AddressFamily.html

February 14, 2016
On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 04:13:12 UTC, Beginner-8 wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Anyone seen Socket constructor which uses already available socket of socket_t type?
>
> I am need to use already connected socket imported from C library without closing them after using.

One of the constructors of class Socket is as follows:

pure nothrow @nogc @safe this(socket_t sock, AddressFamily af);


socket_t is basically a file descriptor which is the type "int".

Your C library provides you "socket_t" value already as far as I understand.
So, you can pass it to constructor.

Unless you explicitly call "close" method of Socket object, its descriptor will
stay allocated for your process/program.
February 14, 2016
On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 06:01:11 UTC, tcak wrote:

> Unless you explicitly call "close" method of Socket object, its descriptor will
> stay allocated for your process/program.

Hmm, I am seen what Socket dtor contains close() too:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/socket.d#L2659

February 14, 2016
On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 06:10:04 UTC, Beginner-8 wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 06:01:11 UTC, tcak wrote:
>
>> Unless you explicitly call "close" method of Socket object, its descriptor will
>> stay allocated for your process/program.
>
> Hmm, I am seen what Socket dtor contains close() too:
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/socket.d#L2659

I would say that the socket should not be closed by my code.

For files this way is wrapFile: "The resulting File never takes the initiative in closing the file."
http://dlang.org/library/std/stdio/file.wrap_file.html

It seems that something like this is necessary also for Socket.

February 14, 2016
(I went to make a patch to Phobos)
February 13, 2016
On 02/13/2016 10:38 PM, Beginner-8 wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 06:10:04 UTC, Beginner-8 wrote:
>> On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 06:01:11 UTC, tcak wrote:
>>
>>> Unless you explicitly call "close" method of Socket object, its
>>> descriptor will
>>> stay allocated for your process/program.
>>
>> Hmm, I am seen what Socket dtor contains close() too:
>>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/socket.d#L2659
>>
>
> I would say that the socket should not be closed by my code.
>
> For files this way is wrapFile: "The resulting File never takes the
> initiative in closing the file."
> http://dlang.org/library/std/stdio/file.wrap_file.html
>
> It seems that something like this is necessary also for Socket.
>

Maybe another option is to duplicate the socket handle before giving it to Socket but I am failing to find a definitive answer or an example.

Ali

February 14, 2016
On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 07:33:11 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:

> Maybe another option is to duplicate the socket handle

Sure!

Nevertheless, it is need method for socket_t duplication. Something like:

class Socket
{
...
static Socket dup(socket_t)
...
}

> before giving it to Socket but I am failing to find a definitive answer or an example.

February 14, 2016
Uh, wait! Forgot about that Socket calls .close() in its dtor
February 14, 2016
On 02/14/2016 12:03 AM, Beginner-8 wrote:
> Uh, wait! Forgot about that Socket calls .close() in its dtor

Try duplicating the socket handle before handing it over to Socket (not compiled nor tested):

import core.sys.posix.unistd;

    Socket(dup(myHandle))

I think socket handles are duplicatable :p things. Only the last close() would actually close the socket.

Ali

« First   ‹ Prev
1 2