Before I open a new bug report, I would like to ask if anyone knows why FunctionAttribute neither has const, immutable, shared or inout?
Especially const and immutable were important to know.

 2/10/13, Namespace <rswhite4@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Before I open a new bug report

It's in bugzilla: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8812

On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 12:29:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> Before I open a new bug report, I would like to ask if anyone knows why FunctionAttribute neither has const, immutable, shared or inout?
> Especially const and immutable were important to know.

Well, technically, those are not function attributes but generic type qualifiers. You can always do something like is(func == const).

You may check recently pulled update to fullyQualifiedName (should be in next release) to see how it works for function types. Not obvious part probably is delegate handling. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/863

On 2/10/13, Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 12:29:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>> Before I open a new bug report, I would like to ask if anyone
>> knows why FunctionAttribute neither has const, immutable,
>> shared or inout?
>> Especially const and immutable were important to know.
>
> Well, technically, those are not function attributes but generic type qualifiers.

In the spec they're listed as member function attributes.

On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 18:25:25 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 2/10/13, Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 12:29:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>> Before I open a new bug report, I would like to ask if anyone
>>> knows why FunctionAttribute neither has const, immutable,
>>> shared or inout?
>>> Especially const and immutable were important to know.
>>
>> Well, technically, those are not function attributes but generic
>> type qualifiers.
>
> In the spec they're listed as member function attributes.

Which part? Probably it refers to delegates, because it has both type qualifiers and attribute that qualifies hidden context pointer.

On 2/10/13, Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which part? Probably it refers to delegates, because it has both type qualifiers and attribute that qualifies hidden context pointer.

Could be. Anyway it's here:

http://dlang.org/declaration.html#MemberFunctionAttributes

On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 19:51:36 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 2/10/13, Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which part? Probably it refers to delegates, because it has both
>> type qualifiers and attribute that qualifies hidden context
>> pointer.
>
> Could be. Anyway it's here:
>
> http://dlang.org/declaration.html#MemberFunctionAttributes

Ye, notice the word "member" and difference with http://dlang.org/declaration.html#FunctionAttributes ; It is for delegates (implicit or explicit) and qualifies context pointer / this, not type itself. Probably functionAttributes template could have handled this special case but I have no idea if it should.