April 01, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Laeeth Isharc | On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do you think you need?
If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit more demanding :) I hope for the former.
|
April 09, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:59:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do you think you need?
>
> If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit more demanding :) I hope for the former.
Mathias Lang has kindly provided me shell access to one Raspberry, investigating the issue.
|
April 09, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 04:30:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:59:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>>> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do you think you need?
>>
>> If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit more demanding :) I hope for the former.
>
> Mathias Lang has kindly provided me shell access to one Raspberry, investigating the issue.
Seems to work for me now with ldc / liblphobos packages 0.15.1-6
Actual issue was so embarassing that I'd better be silent about it :P
|
April 11, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 14:03:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 04:30:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:59:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>>>> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do you think you need?
>>>
>>> If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit more demanding :) I hope for the former.
>>
>> Mathias Lang has kindly provided me shell access to one Raspberry, investigating the issue.
>
> Seems to work for me now with ldc / liblphobos packages 0.15.1-6
> Actual issue was so embarassing that I'd better be silent about it :P
Thanks, v much Dicebot. (I think you have earned the right to own up to making simple errors without embarrassment in case you change your mind - it might help someone else to say what it was).
Laeeth.
|
April 12, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Laeeth Isharc | On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 23:04:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> Thanks, v much Dicebot. (I think you have earned the right to own up to making simple errors without embarrassment in case you change your mind - it might help someone else to say what it was).
Ha ha, it will hardly help anyone. I have simply forgot to increment package version number when doing last fix so it wasn't picked up as a replacement to be built.
|
April 12, 2015 Re: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 18:07:43 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 23:04:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>> Thanks, v much Dicebot. (I think you have earned the right to own up to making simple errors without embarrassment in case you change your mind - it might help someone else to say what it was).
>
> Ha ha, it will hardly help anyone. I have simply forgot to increment package version number when doing last fix so it wasn't picked up as a replacement to be built.
Aha! Easy to do...
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation