Hi!

How to convert D's string to big endian?
How to convert to D's string from big endian?

UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.

On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.

Ok, thanks!

Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:
> Hi!
> 
> How to convert D's string to big endian?
> How to convert to D's string from big endian?
> 
> 

UTF-8 is always big emdian.
-- 
Jordi Sayol

On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:46:43 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> How to convert D's string to big endian?
>> How to convert to D's string from big endian?
>> 
>> 
>
> UTF-8 is always big emdian.

Yes.

(I thought that the problem in this place but the problem was different.)

On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:46:43 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> How to convert D's string to big endian?
>> How to convert to D's string from big endian?
>> 
>> 
>
> UTF-8 is always big emdian.

oops, what?

Q: Is the UTF-8 encoding scheme the same irrespective of whether the underlying processor is little endian or big endian?

A: Yes. Since UTF-8 is interpreted as a sequence of bytes, there is no endian problem as there is for encoding forms that use 16-bit or 32-bit code units. Where a BOM is used with UTF-8, it is only used as an ecoding signature to distinguish UTF-8 from other encodings — it has nothing to do with byte order.

On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.

If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding

On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.
>
> If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding

UTF8 has only one?

10/30/2012 5:17 PM, Tobias Pankrath пишет:
> On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>> UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.
>>
>> If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding
>>
>
> UTF8 has only one?

Even Wiki knows the simple truth:
> Byte order has no meaning in UTF-8, [5] so its only use in UTF-8 is to  signal at the start that the text stream is encoded in UTF-8

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:17:36 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>> UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.
>>
>> If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding
>
> UTF8 has only one?

oops, mixed up and thought he just said "UTF isn't ..."