On Thursday, 10 March 2016 at 21:25:16 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 at 22:12:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I haven't read the article yet, but you'll get more interest by putting a summary as the first comment on reddit.
>
> Thanks for the advice, I think it caused more people to read it.
>
> Also, I forgot to mention in the article that the unit tests with coverage reports enabled run in 110ms. I love fast tests :)

Did you time the python tests too? A value by itself doesn't mean much to me

On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 at 21:55:23 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> The code and docs can be found here: https://github.com/JackStouffer/date-parser

Quick update: all dateutil tests are now passing. It can how parse just about any date format you can throw at it :)