https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

--- Comment #1 from monarchdodra@gmail.com ---
For what it's worth, I tried with/without "-allinst", but it didn't seem to make a difference (but I'm not really sure how that option works anyways...)

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

--- Comment #2 from monarchdodra@gmail.com ---
Has anybody from the DMD team seen this report? I don't need a fix asap or anything, but just confirmation that someone knows about it would be nice.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

--- Comment #3 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx ---
You might want to post this on the newsgroup/forum. I appear to be the only other user on the Cc list for this bug. :-P

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |deadalnix@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> ---
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:

"_D1d3ast10expression52__T15UnaryExpressionTC1d2ir10expression10ExpressionZ15UnaryExpression11__invariantMxFZv",
referenced from:

_D1d3ast10expression52__T15UnaryExpressionTC1d2ir10expression10ExpressionZ15UnaryExpression69__T6__ctorTS1d3ast8qualtype30__T8QualTypeTC1d2ir4type4TypeZ8QualTypeZ6__ctorMFS1d8location8LocationS1d3ast8qualtype30__T8QualTypeTC1d2ir4type4TypeZ8QualTypeE1d3ast10expression7UnaryOpC1d2ir10expression10ExpressionZC1d3ast10expression52__T15UnaryExpressionTC1d2ir10expression10ExpressionZ15UnaryExpression
in libd.a(symbol.o)

This look like this is a blocker for SDC.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|blocker                     |regression

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |thecybershadow@gmail.com

--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> ---
If this is a regression, can you indicate a version when this worked? I'm getting the same error with 2.065.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

--- Comment #6 from monarchdodra@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #5)
> If this is a regression, can you indicate a version when this worked? I'm getting the same error with 2.065.

AFAIK, it's not a reg. I remember having had since since long ago, but reduced it only now.

I don't have access to a mac anymore either, so I wouldn't even be able to check...

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|regression                  |blocker

--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> ---
OK, let's get it off the http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing regression list unless someone can confirm otherwise.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12754

--- Comment #8 from deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to monarchdodra from comment #6)
> (In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #5)
> > If this is a regression, can you indicate a version when this worked? I'm getting the same error with 2.065.
> 
> AFAIK, it's not a reg. I remember having had since since long ago, but reduced it only now.
> 
> I don't have access to a mac anymore either, so I wouldn't even be able to check...

It compile in 2.065, do not in the rc.

It is not because it has been broken for a while in trunck that this isn't a regression.

--