[Issue 6549] Implement contracts without implementation.

March 11, 2014

Posted by Adam D. Ruppe

Permalink

Adam D. Ruppe

Permalink

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6549


Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |destructionator@gmail.com


--- Comment #7 from Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator@gmail.com> 2014-03-10 20:43:44 PDT ---
amen, this should DEFINITELY work. without it, we can't have contracts in .di generation nor in interfaces, making them really hard to use as intended.

This is a bigger problem to me than the lack of preconditions. Ugh.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6549 --- Comment #8 from Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator@gmail.com> 2014-03-10 20:46:56 PDT --- well I guess we *can* have interfaces now, but not abstract classes... random limitation indeed. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Forums