Thread overview | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 17, 2004 MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Any plans to make this upgrade? |
May 17, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | Matthew wrote: > Any plans to make this upgrade? > > I started on it ages ago, but nobody seems to be interested in it. Show me some votes from people that seriously want it and I might complete the port. Thanks! Jan -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
May 17, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | I'm not in need, but am just testing the compatibility for MFCSTL with DMC++, and there're a couple of features that it doesn't support, that's all. ;) "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.us> wrote in message news:c896rk$qpa$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Matthew wrote: > > Any plans to make this upgrade? > > > > > I started on it ages ago, but nobody seems to be interested in it. Show me some votes from people that seriously want it and I might complete the port. > > Thanks! > Jan > > > > -- > ManiaC++ > Jan Knepper > > But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
May 27, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | Jan Knepper <jan@smartsoft.us> wrote in news:c896rk$qpa$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
> Matthew wrote:
>> Any plans to make this upgrade?
>>
> I started on it ages ago, but nobody seems to be interested in it. Show me some votes from people that seriously want it and I might complete the port.
>
> Thanks!
> Jan
That would be nice to have, no doubt about it, though I don't REAllY need it since I have MS VS :)
~/gnf.pt
|
June 04, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to gf | One option is to get the MS SDK downloads (free from MSDN web site) and use the source code to patch what you need. I have run into MFC 4.2 vs 6.0 problems (related to CString::Replace or CPictureHolder for example (see my previous posts)) but I was able to add the functionality I needed with the source from MS. Add a few compiler directives and you can compile in either DM or MS. Andy C In article <Xns94F65BE3EF105mzy2kyahoocom@63.105.9.61>, gf says... > >Jan Knepper <jan@smartsoft.us> wrote in news:c896rk$qpa$1 @digitaldaemon.com: > >> Matthew wrote: >>> Any plans to make this upgrade? >>> >> I started on it ages ago, but nobody seems to be interested in it. Show me some votes from people that seriously want it and I might complete the port. >> >> Thanks! >> Jan > >That would be nice to have, no doubt about it, though I don't REAllY need it since I have MS VS :) > >~/gnf.pt |
June 04, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andy C | Really... For me it is not such much a matter *how* but *when* I have converted MFC 4.21 to Symantec C++ and later Digital Mars C++. Have done the same with libraries from Dundas, Codejock, Rogue Wave, etc... The conversion itself is not a problem it is just that I just do not have the time anymore, especially since we decided to go with wxWidgets in the future and not with MFC... Jan Andy C wrote: > One option is to get the MS SDK downloads (free from MSDN web site) and use the > source code to patch what you need. I have run into MFC 4.2 vs 6.0 problems > (related to CString::Replace or CPictureHolder for example (see my previous > posts)) but I was able to add the functionality I needed with the source from > MS. Add a few compiler directives and you can compile in either DM or MS. > > Andy C -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
June 07, 2004 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | No doubt that wxWidgets is a powerfull GUI toolkit, but whatever we like it or not MFC still remains a major player. It would be nice to have MFC v6.0/v7.0 available in DM. Florin In article <c9qe51$1b78$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Jan Knepper says... > >Really... For me it is not such much a matter *how* but *when* > >I have converted MFC 4.21 to Symantec C++ and later Digital Mars C++. Have done the same with libraries from Dundas, Codejock, Rogue Wave, etc... The conversion itself is not a problem it is just that I just do not have the time anymore, especially since we decided to go with wxWidgets in the future and not with MFC... > >Jan > > > >Andy C wrote: >> One option is to get the MS SDK downloads (free from MSDN web site) and use the source code to patch what you need. I have run into MFC 4.2 vs 6.0 problems (related to CString::Replace or CPictureHolder for example (see my previous posts)) but I was able to add the functionality I needed with the source from MS. Add a few compiler directives and you can compile in either DM or MS. >> >> Andy C > >-- >ManiaC++ >Jan Knepper > >But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
June 29, 2006 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | bs"d I vote for the upgrade -- There are lots of functions in 6 that aren't supported in 4.x that make life easier for programming (and are used regularly in many canned code projects) -- and thanks for your making DMC work! Yochanan "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.us> ??? ??????:c896rk$qpa$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Matthew wrote: >> Any plans to make this upgrade? >> >> > I started on it ages ago, but nobody seems to be interested in it. > Show me some votes from people that seriously want it and I might complete > the port. > > Thanks! > Jan > > > > -- > ManiaC++ > Jan Knepper > > But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
November 21, 2006 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Yochanan | Yes -- DMCnot having MFC 6 is why i gavd up on DMC -- give me 6!! Actually I already have MFC 6 with my VC++6, will it work with the DM compiler? |
November 22, 2006 Re: MFC v4.6 => v6.0 / v7.0 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to greertr | Most likely not without the necessary patching... Jan greertr wrote: > Yes -- DMCnot having MFC 6 is why i gavd up on DMC -- give me 6!! > > Actually I already have MFC 6 with my VC++6, will it work with the > DM compiler? > -- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation