Thread overview
window_visible_scope
May 21, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
May 22, 2004
Matthew
May 26, 2004
Matthew
May 27, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
May 27, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
May 27, 2004
Matthew
May 21, 2004
What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
plans for that?


May 22, 2004
Hmm. I thought I had that.

Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
> plans for that?
>
>


May 26, 2004
Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, which I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!

"Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c8mglm$25e1$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> Hmm. I thought I had that.
>
> Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;)
>
> "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any
> > plans for that?
> >
> >
>
>



May 27, 2004
Great! Thanks...
Started using it already!

> Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,
which
> I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!


May 27, 2004
If you don't mind the question...

What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope) I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change

> Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,
which
> I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!


May 27, 2004
It's a hack, to allow me to declare members as const, and yet proof myself against future maintenance "improvements".

I'm going to write a "Flexible C++" thing about it one day, but time, time time ... ;)


"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c93bku$kaq$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> If you don't mind the question...
>
> What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope) I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change
>
> > Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1,
> which
> > I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah!
>
>