Thread overview
Rangelib in 1.8.1 not compiling
Oct 11, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
Oct 11, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
Oct 12, 2004
Matthew
Oct 12, 2004
Matthew
Oct 12, 2004
Matthew
Mar 01, 2005
Matthew
Oct 12, 2004
Pablo Aguilar
October 11, 2004
Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...

iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits type.


October 11, 2004
Should I have posted this in the rangelib group?

> Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...
>
> iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits type.


October 12, 2004
No, this one's better.


"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ckf3cn$2auh$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Should I have posted this in the rangelib group?
>
> > Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...
> >
> > iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits
type.
>
>


October 12, 2004
Any chance you can send me your source file? I can't seem to find a problem here?

Also, what compiler are you using? (You're going to say Borland, aren't
you? ;/ )

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ckf3b8$2at6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...
>
> iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits type.
>
>


October 12, 2004
Don't worry about it. I know what's wrong. 1.8.3 will fix it.

Thanks again


"Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:ckg0ch$11p$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> Any chance you can send me your source file? I can't seem to find a problem here?
>
> Also, what compiler are you using? (You're going to say Borland,
aren't
> you? ;/ )
>
> "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ckf3b8$2at6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...
> >
> > iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits
type.
> >
> >
>
>


October 12, 2004
> Any chance you can send me your source file? I can't seem to find a problem here?
>
> Also, what compiler are you using? (You're going to say Borland, aren't
> you? ;/ )

No, sorry... VC++6 SP6, Borland I just use for Quick&Dirty tools I suddenly need...


March 01, 2005
RangeLib should have had a serious boost in correctness and usability with 1.8.3 beta 1.

Alas, iterator_range is still out of action. (You might want to check out indexed_range. Not related, but nice for any Ruby programmers ... <g>)


"Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:ckg1uh$3c8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Don't worry about it. I know what's wrong. 1.8.3 will fix it.
>
> Thanks again
>
>
> "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:ckg0ch$11p$2@digitaldaemon.com...
>> Any chance you can send me your source file? I can't seem to find a problem here?
>>
>> Also, what compiler are you using? (You're going to say Borland,
> aren't
>> you? ;/ )
>>
>> "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ckf3b8$2at6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> > Rangelib's iterator_range.hpp included with 1.8.1 doesn't compile...
>> >
>> > iterator_range_traits complains about a missing base_type_traits
> type.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>