Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 30, 2013 llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Anyone know what the official status of llvm 3.4 is? The website continues to list 3.3 as the current release while now indicating that 3.5 is the upcoming release; there's nothing on the announcements mailing list archive, but the development release of Ubuntu has landed 3.4 packages with release version numbers, not rc. Really I'm just wondering which llvm-dev I should use for my next LDC build :-P |
December 30, 2013 Re: llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joseph Rushton Wakeling | On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 08:42:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Anyone know what the official status of llvm 3.4 is? The website continues to list 3.3 as the current release while now indicating that 3.5 is the upcoming release; there's nothing on the announcements mailing list archive, but the development release of Ubuntu has landed 3.4 packages with release version numbers, not rc.
>
> Really I'm just wondering which llvm-dev I should use for my next LDC build :-P
I just used the llvm trunk together with LDC a week a ago and it worked fine.
I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.
|
January 01, 2014 Re: llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dwhatever | Hi Josepd! On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote: > On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 08:42:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > > I just used the llvm trunk together with LDC a week a ago and it worked fine. Currently, it is broke (changed or new library). I'll fix this soon. > I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet. I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list. Regards, Kai |
January 01, 2014 Re: llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kai Nacke | On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote:
>> I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.
>
> I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list.
I'm assuming that more than anything it's just holiday-induced crossed wires :-)
|
January 02, 2014 Re: llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kai Nacke | On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: > Currently, it is broke (changed or new library). I'll fix this soon. Ok, this was a problem of my build environment. You can use LLVM 3.4 or LLVM trunk without problems. There is a known failure with LLVM trunk - it is possible an instance of issue #546 (https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/546). Regards, Kai |
January 06, 2014 Re: llvm 3.4 status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joseph Rushton Wakeling | On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 20:21:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 15:40:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> On Monday, 30 December 2013 at 10:05:18 UTC, Dwhatever wrote:
>>> I've no idea why they removed 3.4 on the llvm site. Maybe it's just not fully updated yet.
>>
>> I think that's it. There was no announcement on the devel mailing list.
>
> I'm assuming that more than anything it's just holiday-induced crossed wires :-)
The LLVM page now lists 3.4 as latest release.
Regards,
Kai
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation