View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
January 10, 2007
Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Jon Erickson posts some positive comments the release of D v1.0 on
the Dr. Dobb's Blog Portal. And said that Walter deserves a pat on
the back for his work on D. ( I know we all would agree totally
with this comment. :) )

Here's the link:
http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
l

David L.
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
David L. Davis wrote:
> Jon Erickson posts some positive comments the release of D v1.0 on
> the Dr. Dobb's Blog Portal. And said that Walter deserves a pat on
> the back for his work on D. ( I know we all would agree totally
> with this comment. :) )
> 
> Here's the link:
> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
> l
> 
> David L.

Nice article.  It's great to see some genuinely positive press out 
there, even if it is a little light on the details. ;)

For those who are getting a 404, make sure you have that 'l' on the end 
of your link - it was wrapped and broken in my viewer (Thunderbird) as 
you can see above.

-- 
- EricAnderton at yahoo
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Pragma wrote:
> David L. Davis wrote:
>> Jon Erickson posts some positive comments the release of D v1.0 on
>> the Dr. Dobb's Blog Portal. And said that Walter deserves a pat on
>> the back for his work on D. ( I know we all would agree totally
>> with this comment. :) )
>>
>> Here's the link:
>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.html
> 
> Nice article.  It's great to see some genuinely positive press out 
> there, even if it is a little light on the details. ;)

Jon Erickson has always been supportive of D, and has always been very 
nice to me and easy to work with.
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Walter Bright wrote:
> Pragma wrote:
>> David L. Davis wrote:
>>> Jon Erickson posts some positive comments the release of D v1.0 on
>>> the Dr. Dobb's Blog Portal. And said that Walter deserves a pat on
>>> the back for his work on D. ( I know we all would agree totally
>>> with this comment. :) )
>>>
>>> Here's the link:
>>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.html
>>
>> Nice article.  It's great to see some genuinely positive press out 
>> there, even if it is a little light on the details. ;)
> 
> Jon Erickson has always been supportive of D, and has always been very 
> nice to me and easy to work with.

Jon Erickson .. man that name sounds very familiar .. where did I hear 
it before?
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
"David L. Davis" <SpottedTiger@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:eo3ff5$fom$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Jon Erickson posts some positive comments the release of D v1.0 on
> the Dr. Dobb's Blog Portal. And said that Walter deserves a pat on
> the back for his work on D. ( I know we all would agree totally
> with this comment. :) )
>
> Here's the link:
> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
> l

I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
>> l
> 
> I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S 
> 
> 
Use also the 'l' on the next line ;D
January 10, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
"Frank Benoit (keinfarbton)" <benoit@tionex.removethispart.de> wrote in 
message news:eo3s3n$1147$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
>>> l
>>
>> I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S
>>
>>
> Use also the 'l' on the next line ;D

Stupid newsgroups!  :)
January 11, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Frank Benoit (keinfarbton)" <benoit@tionex.removethispart.de> wrote in 
> message news:eo3s3n$1147$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
>>>> l
>>> I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S
>>>
>>>
>> Use also the 'l' on the next line ;D
> 
> Stupid newsgroups!  :) 

No. Stupid web-interface.

For example, RFC 3676 states:

"""If faced with such a word which exceeds 78 characters (but less than 
998 characters, the [SMTP] limit on line length), the agent SHOULD send
the word as is and exceed the 78-character limit on line length."""

-- 
/Oskar
January 11, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Oskar Linde wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> "Frank Benoit (keinfarbton)" <benoit@tionex.removethispart.de> wrote 
>> in message news:eo3s3n$1147$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>>>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
>>>>> l
>>>> I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Use also the 'l' on the next line ;D
>>
>> Stupid newsgroups!  :) 
> 
> No. Stupid web-interface.
> 
> For example, RFC 3676 states:
> 
> """If faced with such a word which exceeds 78 characters (but less than 
> 998 characters, the [SMTP] limit on line length), the agent SHOULD send
> the word as is and exceed the 78-character limit on line length."""

For what it's worth, Thunderbird breaks up the link as well.  Drives me 
crazy.


Sean
January 12, 2007
Re: Dr.Dobb's Blog Portal posts "D's the Real Deal -- Finally"
Thunderbird line wrapping is configurable.
See Tools/Options.../Composition/General/Wrap plain text messages at _ characters.


Sean Kelly wrote:
> Oskar Linde wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> "Frank Benoit (keinfarbton)" <benoit@tionex.removethispart.de> wrote 
>>> in message news:eo3s3n$1147$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>>>>> http://www.ddj.com/blog/portal/archives/2007/01/ds_the_real_dea.htm
>>>>>> l
>>>>> I get a 404 and searching for the article doesn't yield anything.  :S
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Use also the 'l' on the next line ;D
>>>
>>> Stupid newsgroups!  :) 
>>
>> No. Stupid web-interface.
>>
>> For example, RFC 3676 states:
>>
>> """If faced with such a word which exceeds 78 characters (but less 
>> than 998 characters, the [SMTP] limit on line length), the agent 
>> SHOULD send
>> the word as is and exceed the 78-character limit on line length."""
> 
> For what it's worth, Thunderbird breaks up the link as well.  Drives me 
> crazy.
> 
> 
> Sean
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home