View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
July 01, 2007
DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Just bug fixes common to both.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.018.zip

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.002.zip
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
> Just bug fixes common to both.

Great news! And special thanks for fixing bug 540...

Unfortunately, this code (which appears in derelict) broke

-
version(Windows)
 extern(Windows):
else
 extern(C):

Declaration expected, not 'else'
-

Looking around in the spec, I can not find where the StorageClass: syntax is
defined, so maybe it is supposed to be illegal?

Cheers,
Christian
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:24:22 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Just bug fixes common to both.

Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D

-- 
Best regards,
 Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow@gmail.com
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Christian Kamm wrote:
>> Just bug fixes common to both.
> 
> Great news! And special thanks for fixing bug 540...
> 
> Unfortunately, this code (which appears in derelict) broke
> 
> -
> version(Windows)
>   extern(Windows):
> else
>   extern(C):
> 
> Declaration expected, not 'else'
> -

Workaround:
---
version(Windows) {
  extern(Windows):
} else {
  extern(C):
}
---

> Looking around in the spec, I can not find where the StorageClass: syntax is
> defined, [snip]

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/attribute.html
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D

The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Walter Bright skrev:
> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those 
>> issues! :D
> 
> The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!

The number of resolved bugs is nevertheless impressive:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=RESOLVED%3A

/Oskar
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:24:22 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Renamed linux library from libphobos.a to libphobos2.a

It seems like D 2.001's libphobos.a got packaged instead of the new libphobos2.a by accident :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow@gmail.com
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Thank you very much for the last two bugfix releases!
Once you got in going don't stop! ;-)

Thanks again,
David
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Oskar Linde wrote:
> Walter Bright skrev:
>> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those 
>>> issues! :D
>>
>> The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!
> 
> The number of resolved bugs is nevertheless impressive:
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=RESOLVED%3A 
> 
> 
> /Oskar

Looking at that chart there does seem to be a significant dent :)
July 01, 2007
Re: DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
> Just bug fixes common to both.

This makes me very happy, particularly since I'm contemplating using 1.0 for a small albeit longer-term project. So thank you.

May I suggest automating or eliminating the "Download latest stable (1.016)" blurb in the ChangeLog? It would seem to me that all future versions of 1.0 are meant to be stable.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home