April 02, 2008Re: Fully transitive const is not necessary
Janice Caron Wrote: > On 02/04/2008, guslay <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > What's logical const anyway? > > By my definition, a C++ class is logically const, if and only if at > least one of its member variables is declared using the keyword > "mutable". > > If other people use the phrase to mean something different, that > probably explains much of the confusion. Ok, let's take your definition. I would like to hear your reflexion about the rest of the post, that is how D "totally-not-logical-const" is conceptually not different than "logical const".