http://petermodzelewski.blogspot.com/2008/10/tango-conference-2008-compiler-and.html

First (of many) conference video.


---------------
Piotr Modzelewski
keyer.team0xf.com

Peter Modzelewski wrote:
> http://petermodzelewski.blogspot.com/2008/10/tango-conference-2008-compiler-and.html
> 
> First (of many) conference video.

Cool! But do I need to register at vimeo to be able to download the video?  I'm not able to seek to the end of the embedded video...

torhu pisze:
> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>> http://petermodzelewski.blogspot.com/2008/10/tango-conference-2008-compiler-and.html 
>>
>>
>> First (of many) conference video.
> 
> Cool! But do I need to register at vimeo to be able to download the video?  I'm not able to seek to the end of the embedded video...

I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
video.

Skipping is possible when it buffers - yeah it's a bit inconvinient but
there is little I can do about it.

Registration is quick so there should not be a problem if you want to download it.

Peter Modzelewski wrote:
> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this video.

Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.

Kenny B wrote:
> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
>> uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
>> surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
>> video.
> 
> Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.

Vimeo has better quality than that, too.

It's a shame Stage6 went down... :-(

Robert Fraser wrote:
> Kenny B wrote:
>> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>>> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
>>> uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
>>> surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
>>> video.
>>
>> Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.
> 
> Vimeo has better quality than that, too.
> 
> It's a shame Stage6 went down... :-(

How big is it?  Maybe I could just host the video file on my website (dreamhost acct), at least temporarily.  It wouldn't stream, but if you are going for quality, well, American Internet? quality streaming? Lol.

(OK, so some of you are a bit more fortunate, but lowest common denominator and such...)

Chad J pisze:
> Robert Fraser wrote:
>> Kenny B wrote:
>>> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>>>> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
>>>> uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
>>>> surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
>>>> video.
>>>
>>> Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.
>>
>> Vimeo has better quality than that, too.
>>
>> It's a shame Stage6 went down... :-(
> 
> How big is it?  Maybe I could just host the video file on my website (dreamhost acct), at least temporarily.  It wouldn't stream, but if you are going for quality, well, American Internet? quality streaming? Lol.
> 
> (OK, so some of you are a bit more fortunate, but lowest common denominator and such...)

Each video will be about 500 MB
There will be about 12 movie files that size
If you want to host it - no problem :)

Peter Modzelewski wrote:
> Each video will be about 500 MB
> There will be about 12 movie files that size
> If you want to host it - no problem :)

How about bittorrent, then?

Peter Modzelewski wrote:
> Chad J pisze:
>> Robert Fraser wrote:
>>> Kenny B wrote:
>>>> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>>>>> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
>>>>> uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
>>>>> surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
>>>>> video.
>>>>
>>>> Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.
>>>
>>> Vimeo has better quality than that, too.
>>>
>>> It's a shame Stage6 went down... :-(
>>
>> How big is it?  Maybe I could just host the video file on my website (dreamhost acct), at least temporarily.  It wouldn't stream, but if you are going for quality, well, American Internet? quality streaming? Lol.
>>
>> (OK, so some of you are a bit more fortunate, but lowest common denominator and such...)
> 
> Each video will be about 500 MB
> There will be about 12 movie files that size
> If you want to host it - no problem :)

w00t I have unlimited storage/transfer now.

So yeah, I'll host it.

Sorry for my slowness, I got distracted and kinda forgot :(

"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gc423b$2qhe$1@digitalmars.com...
> Kenny B wrote:
>> Peter Modzelewski wrote:
>>> I've choosen vimeo because it's the only page dedicated for video
>>> uploading which gives such quality. It has it's disadvantages but you
>>> surelly would appriciate it if you saw what youtube would make of this
>>> video.
>>
>> Google video? I often times see presentations and talks uploaded to google video.
>
> Vimeo has better quality than that, too.
>
> It's a shame Stage6 went down... :-(

You might want to check http://www.hdshare.tv/  same quality but no registration needed.