View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
On Wednesday, 15 February 2012 at 04:47:27 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> Anyone care to count up the number of bug fixes here?
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.073.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.058.zip

The v2.058 tag in the git repo is missing

/Jonas
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
On 15.02.2012 17:21, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Anyone care to count up the number of bug fixes here?
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.073.zip
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.058.zip
>
> Great! Keep up good work!
>
> One note thought: I see that there are some new features borrowed from
> 2.057 log. Is this on purpose or an oversight?

Nice release!

Though I see that the library bugs section is almost identical to 2.057 O_o

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
On Thursday, February 16, 2012 00:10:20 Caligo wrote:
> float x = 1.f;  // GIVES ERROR
> 
> float y = 0.f;  // OK
> 
> what's up with that?  Is that a bug?

I would think so.

- Jonathan M Davis
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
On 2/16/2012 1:00 AM, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
> The v2.058 tag in the git repo is missing

git tag

shows it's there.
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
Is it trying to call function  f(int x) on 1 with new universal
syntax? :)

Il giorno gio, 16/02/2012 alle 01.29 -0800, Jonathan M Davis ha scritto:

> On Thursday, February 16, 2012 00:10:20 Caligo wrote:
> > float x = 1.f;  // GIVES ERROR
> > 
> > float y = 0.f;  // OK
> > 
> > what's up with that?  Is that a bug?
> 
> I would think so.
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
Great work guys! That's a lot of bug fixes.

I was completely excited about UFCS when I read it had been 
implemented, but it
doesn't seem to work. What has it been implemented for exactly?
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
Am 15.02.2012, 23:07 Uhr, schrieb Ali Çehreli <acehreli@yahoo.com>:

> On 02/15/2012 07:49 AM, bearophile wrote:
>> Andrej Mitrovic:
>>
>>> That doesn't seem to work. So does anyone know what exactly is  
>>> implemented?
>>
>> I don't know. See:
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/582
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> Is UFCS DOA? Here is my experiment:
>
> struct S
> {}
>
> @property int foo(S)
> {
>      return 42;
> }
>
> void main()
> {
>      auto s = S();
>      s.foo();       // Error: no property 'foo' for type 'S'
> }
>
> Ali

I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on classes and  
structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper methods of those. If  
2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for literals. Try "123.foo;".
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
Am 16.02.2012, 10:11 Uhr, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh@gmail.com>:

> On 15.02.2012 17:21, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> Anyone care to count up the number of bug fixes here?
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.073.zip
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>>> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.058.zip
>>
>> Great! Keep up good work!
>>
>> One note thought: I see that there are some new features borrowed from
>> 2.057 log. Is this on purpose or an oversight?
>
> Nice release!
>
> Though I see that the library bugs section is almost identical to 2.057  
> O_o

Now that you say it ... the Makefile patch, the to!float("INF2") fix. We  
should run a diff before counting ;)
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:45:46 +0100, Marco Leise <Marco.Leise@gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 15.02.2012, 23:07 Uhr, schrieb Ali Çehreli <acehreli@yahoo.com>:
>
>> On 02/15/2012 07:49 AM, bearophile wrote:
>>> Andrej Mitrovic:
>>>
>>>> That doesn't seem to work. So does anyone know what exactly is  
>>>> implemented?
>>>
>>> I don't know. See:
>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/582
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> bearophile
>>
>> Is UFCS DOA? Here is my experiment:
>>
>> struct S
>> {}
>>
>> @property int foo(S)
>> {
>>      return 42;
>> }
>>
>> void main()
>> {
>>      auto s = S();
>>      s.foo();       // Error: no property 'foo' for type 'S'
>> }
>>
>> Ali
>
> I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on classes and  
> structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper methods of those. If  
> 2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for literals. Try "123.foo;".

I thought floating point literals should change so 0 is required. No more  
.0 or 0. .
February 16, 2012
Re: dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release
Marco Leise wrote:
> I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on 
> classes and structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper 
> methods of those. If 2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for 
> literals. Try "123.foo;".

C#'s had "UFSC" for years without ambiguity problems. Also, 
"123.foo;" doesn't work.
1 2 3 4 5
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home