Page
PDF spec
Jan 24, 2013
Walter Bright
Jan 24, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Jan 24, 2013
kiskami
Jan 24, 2013
Paulo Pinto
Jan 27, 2013
SomeDude
Jan 30, 2013
Jordi Sayol
Jan 30, 2013
kiskami
Jan 30, 2013
Paulo Pinto
Jan 31, 2013
kiskami
Jan 31, 2013
Jordi Sayol
Jan 31, 2013
kiskami
Jan 31, 2013
Jordi Sayol
Feb 01, 2013
kiskami
Feb 02, 2013
Jordi Sayol
Feb 02, 2013
SomeDude
Feb 02, 2013
Jordi Sayol
Feb 02, 2013
kiskami
Jan 24, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Jan 24, 2013
H. S. Teoh
Jan 24, 2013
Philippe Sigaud
Jan 24, 2013
FG
Jan 25, 2013
FG
Jan 25, 2013
Philippe Sigaud
Jan 24, 2013
Paulo Pinto
Jan 24, 2013
Wyatt
Jan 25, 2013
Nicolas Sicard
Jan 27, 2013
SomeDude
Feb 02, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Feb 02, 2013
FG
Feb 06, 2013
Marco Nembrini
Feb 03, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Feb 03, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Feb 02, 2013
TommiT
Feb 03, 2013
Dejan Lekic
Feb 03, 2013
Walter Bright
Feb 04, 2013
Dejan Lekic
Feb 04, 2013
Walter Bright
There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has 386 pages of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!

http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf

(still subject to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9369, so don't mind the absent underscores here and there)

Andrei
On 1/23/2013 10:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has 386 pages
> of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!
>
> http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf

Awesome progress!

I think pdf allows for clickable links. Do you think those would be a good idea? I did make them work in the ebook version.

On 1/24/13 1:33 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/23/2013 10:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has
>> 386 pages
>> of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!
>>
>> http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf
>
> Awesome progress!
>
> I think pdf allows for clickable links. Do you think those would be a
> good idea? I did make them work in the ebook version.

Yes, it does, and I even think I use it in a few places. But I haven't pursued links systematically yet.

Andrei

On 2013-01-24 07:36, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Yes, it does, and I even think I use it in a few places. But I haven't

--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-01-24 07:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has 386
> pages of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!
>
> http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf
>
> (still subject to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9369, so
> don't mind the absent underscores here and there)

I know that this is that standard layout/theme of Latex but I don't understand why links need to looks so horrible. A red or cyan square around the text.

--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 06:36:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I think pdf allows for clickable links. Do you think those would be a
>> good idea? I did make them work in the ebook version.
>
> Yes, it does, and I even think I use it in a few places. But I haven't pursued links systematically yet.
>
> Andrei

Just my 2c:
The - in windows\bin resident - d.chm is very good for using as a reference, because you have a linked TOC, text and keyword search and bookmarks capability all the time on the left.

IMHO the pdf format is more suited for printing or maybe reading on ebook readers, but it would be definitely userfriendlier to have the TOC links on the bookmarks tab in Acrobat Reader. :)
On 1/24/13 3:20 AM, kiskami wrote:
> IMHO the pdf format is more suited for printing or maybe reading on
> ebook readers, but it would be definitely userfriendlier to have the TOC

Printing would be indeed the main target of the PDF.

Andrei
Am 24.01.2013 07:26, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has 386
> pages of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!
>
> http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf
>
> (still subject to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9369, so
> don't mind the absent underscores here and there)
>
>
> Andrei

Great!
Am 24.01.2013 17:25, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 1/24/13 3:20 AM, kiskami wrote:
>> IMHO the pdf format is more suited for printing or maybe reading on
>> ebook readers, but it would be definitely userfriendlier to have the TOC
>
> Printing would be indeed the main target of the PDF.
>
> Andrei

I rather spare some trees. :)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:00:54AM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-01-24 07:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec already has 386 pages of goodness and starts to look seriously cool. Take a peek!
> >
> >http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf
> >
> >(still subject to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9369, so don't mind the absent underscores here and there)
>
> I know that this is that standard layout/theme of Latex but I don't understand why links need to looks so horrible. A red or cyan square around the text.
[...]

Isn't this be configurable?

T

--
Жил-был король когда-то, при нём блоха жила.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3 4 5