Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.

Andrei

On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
>
> Andrei

Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?

http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html

"Compute n * 2⊃"

Huh?

On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 23:44:30 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
> Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?

I think it's intentional that they don't duplicate the documentation for those headers, but we probably should add links to pages that document the C headers.

std.string looks fine only the indexOfNeither and lastIndexOfNeither are missing

On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 00:06:28 UTC, Danny wrote:
> http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html
>
> "Compute n * 2⊃"
>
> Huh?

Weird.

It's `Compute n * 2$(SUP exp)` in the source[1]. SUP is a locally defined macro. Maybe ddox doesn't like local macros?

1. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/v2.066.1/src/core/math.d#L96

On 1/6/15 4:26 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> std.string looks fine only the indexOfNeither and lastIndexOfNeither are
> missing

Could you please fix -- thanks! -- Andrei

On 1/6/15 4:42 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 00:06:28 UTC, Danny wrote:
>> http://dlang.org/library/core/math/ldexp.html
>>
>> "Compute n * 2⊃"
>>
>> Huh?
>
> Weird.
>
> It's `Compute n * 2$(SUP exp)` in the source[1]. SUP is a locally
> defined macro. Maybe ddox doesn't like local macros?
>
> 1.
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/v2.066.1/src/core/math.d#L96

Yah, looks like a problem with ddox. Anyhow for now I fixed by using SUPERSCRIPT.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/8f655bbdd8f7aa77907053c918d78d2286c93ab2

http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/core/math/ldexp.html


Andrei

On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
>> here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?

It's a somewhat unfortunate fallout of the level of granularity. I think each of these headers should include a standard text and a link to some good documentation in C-land. -- Andrei

On 1/6/15 5:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from here:
> http://dlang.org/library/index.html.

std.algorithm has many of the "descriptions" showing samples. Also, I know the table at the top is to make things easier for standard ddoc, should that be removed?

BTW, I'm all for the docs to be switched. Just the cross-referencing alone is worth it.

-Steve