Second beta for the 2.069.0 release.

http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html

Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org

-Martin

On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 13:53:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Second beta for the 2.069.0 release.
>
> http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html
>
> Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
>
> -Martin

Is there any reason that these fixes won't be merged for 2.069?

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3711
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3688
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3689

I'd prefer not having to maintain my own fork of the allocators code for another release.

On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 13:53:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Second beta for the 2.069.0 release.
>
> http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html
>
> Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
>
> -Martin

got through to homebrew a faster this time.

brew reinstall dmd --devel

On 10/14/2015 08:09 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason that these fixes won't be merged for 2.069?

Please target the stable branch when fixing something.
Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that yourself?).
I don't examine PRs before branching or tagging a version and only take
what has been finished. The dates are announced early enough to plan
ahead, but it'll prolly take a few more cycles until everyone has the
next release in mind.

-Martin

On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:26:12 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that yourself?).

No. I would if I could. This one of the things I don't like about Github. (I can't tag pulls/issues even though I'm a member of the D-Programming-Language org)

On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:44:34 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:26:12 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that yourself?).
>
> No. I would if I could. This one of the things I don't like about Github. (I can't tag pulls/issues even though I'm a member of the D-Programming-Language org)

You're not in Team Phobos.

On 10/15/15 3:05 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:44:34 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:26:12 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>> Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that
>>> yourself?).
>>
>> No. I would if I could. This one of the things I don't like about
>> Github. (I can't tag pulls/issues even though I'm a member of the
>> D-Programming-Language org)
>
> You're not in Team Phobos.

Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei

indeed!

On 10/15/15 10:51 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei
>
> indeed!

Dunn. -- Andrei

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:33:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 10/15/15 10:51 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei
>>
>> indeed!
>
> Dunn. -- Andrei

nice