Hi,

This week I took a deeper look into my fix for this bug. It involves storing the lowering in a new field within CatAssignExp (called lowering). It previously ran into a backend error that turned out to be caused by incorrectly inlining the lowering instead of the CatAssignExp. The lowering could not be inlined as often as the original expression.

With this out of the way, I am now facing another error during CTFE as it cannot interpret the lowering. But similarly to the backend error from earlier, CTFE shouldn't interpret this lowering. Now I am trying to skip this step and interpret the right thing instead.

In addition, the PR for converting _d_newarray{U,iT,T} to templates was merged and a discussion arose about including it in the changelog. I'm not sure about this, so I created this PR to add a changelog entry about the template _d_newarrayT. If you have any opinions on this, let's discuss them there.

Thanks,
Teodor