Hi, I solved the issue.
PR is coming shortly.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Hi, I solved the issue.
> PR is coming shortly.

How was they getting recursive?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Hi, I solved the issue.
> PR is coming shortly.

Dude come on, that isn't an announce. There is No PR, there is no description of the solution, there is nothing.

Hey guys, I cured cancer and solved world hunger. PR coming soon.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 18:02:41 UTC, Jerry wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi, I solved the issue.
>> PR is coming shortly.
>
> How was they getting recursive?

Think to the fibo templatized example, it generates a very long mangle with basically always the same symbol.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 19:41:49 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi, I solved the issue.
>> PR is coming shortly.
>
> Dude come on, that isn't an announce. There is No PR, there is no description of the solution, there is nothing.
>
> Hey guys, I cured cancer and solved world hunger. PR coming soon.

Lol ! My turn:

I'm a genious but I haven't done anything genial yet...

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Hi, I solved the issue.
> PR is coming shortly.

Solution is as follows:

Keep a list of already visited symbols in the mangler.
And information where we store the mangle.
meaning the position in the mangle string.
If a symbol is encountered for the second time store a backrefernce rather then the symbol name again.

On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 04:58:45 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi, I solved the issue.
>> PR is coming shortly.
>
> Solution is as follows:
>
> Keep a list of already visited symbols in the mangler.
> And information where we store the mangle.
> meaning the position in the mangle string.
> If a symbol is encountered for the second time store a backrefernce rather then the symbol name again.

You mean this?
https://github.com/weka-io/ldc/commit/ffd6b55a4b83b3007d9690cbd9a25d07b243a00e

It did not result in a large reduction of symbol sizes.
http://forum.dlang.org/post/szodxrizfmufqdkpdryc@forum.dlang.org

On 09.06.2016 11:02, Johan Engelen wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 04:58:45 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> Hi, I solved the issue.
>>> PR is coming shortly.
>>
>> Solution is as follows:
>>
>> Keep a list of already visited symbols in the mangler.
>> And information where we store the mangle.
>> meaning the position in the mangle string.
>> If a symbol is encountered for the second time store a backrefernce
>> rather then the symbol name again.
>
> You mean this?
> https://github.com/weka-io/ldc/commit/ffd6b55a4b83b3007d9690cbd9a25d07b243a00e
>

This doesn't handle the manglers created locally for templates and parameter tuples. Here's a more complete version: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5855

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 20:15:57 UTC, FlatBareRunner wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 19:41:49 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> Hi, I solved the issue.
>>> PR is coming shortly.
>>
>> Dude come on, that isn't an announce. There is No PR, there is no description of the solution, there is nothing.
>>
>> Hey guys, I cured cancer and solved world hunger. PR coming soon.
>
> Lol ! My turn:
>
> I'm a genious but I haven't done anything genial yet...

Writer here. Not yet published but working hard on the first one...