This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, 
but I didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.

    Three Unlikely Successful Features of D

    
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5

Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! 
Although I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated 
the crowd quite well with this one :)

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 13:46:50 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, 
> but I didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>
>     Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>
>     
> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5

Some comments:

Using goto for cleanup is a common trick probably known to most 
modern C users. Maybe the C slide should have used goto, or there 
could have been two C slides; the current setup was perhaps 
slightly unfair to C programmers who would never think of writing 
several indentations of rollback-cleanup.

C# programmers might want a word with you about slide #8, as C# 
does have the `using` statement to help with cleanup in a sort-of 
RAII-style way, except it still needs a level of indentation; 
it's not revolutionary and not nearly as good as D style or even 
C++ style cleanup, but it does improve it over the pure Java 
model.

The editor comment would've made a great segue into mentioning 
VisualD - I don't actually know much about the composition of the 
audience, but it is a Microsoft hosted conference :V

I think it's important to emphasize that string mixins are only 
available at compile-time, I think the host of eval()-like 
functions in other languages have soured quite a few people to 
the idea of mixing in strings as code. It should've been obvious 
to anyone who was paying attention, but it's probably worth 
mentioning nevertheless.

Slide #23: font size too big 8)

Anyway, overall, one of the best presentations about D I've seen 
yet, it's always a joy to watch these videos.

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 13:46:50 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, 
> but I didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>
>     Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>
>     
> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>
> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! 
> Although I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated 
> the crowd quite well with this one :)

Reddit:

    
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s66e8/three_unlikely_successful_features_of_d_langnext/

On 4/12/12 9:13 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 13:46:50 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, but I
>> didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>>
>> Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>>
>>
>> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! Although
>> I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated the crowd quite
>> well with this one :)
>
> Reddit:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s66e8/three_unlikely_successful_features_of_d_langnext/
>

Rats, there are two posts:

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s617m/three_unlikely_successful_features_of_d_andrei/


Andrei

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 14:15:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 4/12/12 9:13 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>> On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 13:46:50 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>>> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on 
>>> it, but I
>>> didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>>>
>>> Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>>>
>>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! 
>>> Although
>>> I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated the 
>>> crowd quite
>>> well with this one :)
>>
>> Reddit:
>>
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s66e8/three_unlikely_successful_features_of_d_langnext/
>>
>
> Rats, there are two posts:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s617m/three_unlikely_successful_features_of_d_andrei/
>
>
> Andrei

Agh, I missed it, sorry! I deleted mine.

(Hey, mine linked directly to the HTML5 version, I take solace in 
this fact :P)

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:49 +0200, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, but I  
> didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>
>      Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>
>       
> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>
> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! Although I'm  
> judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated the crowd quite well  
> with this one :)

The generalized palindrome doesn't work with odd lengths.
simple fix:

bool palindrome(Range)(Range range) {
    for (; !range.empty; range.popFront(), range.empty || range.popBack())  
{
        if (range.front != range.back)
            return false;
    }
    return true;
}

On 4/12/12 4:57 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:49 +0200, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, but I
>> didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>>
>> Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>>
>>
>> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! Although
>> I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated the crowd quite
>> well with this one :)
>
> The generalized palindrome doesn't work with odd lengths.
> simple fix:
>
> bool palindrome(Range)(Range range) {
> for (; !range.empty; range.popFront(), range.empty || range.popBack()) {
> if (range.front != range.back)
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> }

Ouch. Thanks.

Andrei

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 22:15:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 4/12/12 4:57 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> The generalized palindrome doesn't work with odd lengths.
>> simple fix:
>>
>> bool palindrome(Range)(Range range) {
>> for (; !range.empty; range.popFront(), range.empty || 
>> range.popBack()) {
>> if (range.front != range.back)
>> return false;
>> }
>> return true;
>> }
>
> Ouch. Thanks.

Call me stupid, but how exactly is the version from Andrei's 
slides broken?

David

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 22:27:03 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> Call me stupid, but how exactly is the version from Andrei's 
> slides broken?

Disregard that, I was looking at the array slicing version.

David

On 4/12/12 4:57 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:49 +0200, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This video went up a while ago. I would like to comment on it, but I
>> didn't see any thread about it, so here it is.
>>
>> Three Unlikely Successful Features of D
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D?format=html5
>>
>>
>> Thanks to Andrei Alexandrescu for this great presentation! Although
>> I'm judging by the video alone, I feel you captivated the crowd quite
>> well with this one :)
>
> The generalized palindrome doesn't work with odd lengths.
> simple fix:
>
> bool palindrome(Range)(Range range) {
> for (; !range.empty; range.popFront(), range.empty || range.popBack()) {
> if (range.front != range.back)
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> }

Wrote a comment:

http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Three-Unlikely-Successful-Features-of-D

Thanks for the fix!


Andrei