It seems to me that is randomly fails in Linux 64bit or 32/64bit platforms.

core.exception.AssertError@core.sync.condition(618): Assertion failure http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?dataid=198029

The results in Linux 64bit column are more red than others. http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/pulls.ghtml

Regards.

Kenji Hara
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

On Monday, July 02, 2012 09:33:31 kenji hara wrote:
> It seems to me that is randomly fails in Linux 64bit or 32/64bit platforms.
> 
> core.exception.AssertError@core.sync.condition(618): Assertion failure http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?dataid=198029
> 
> The results in Linux 64bit column are more red than others. http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/pulls.ghtml

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that that's one of the tests that randomly fails. I believe that there's a semaphore-related one which fails sometimes on some set of platforms, but I don't know which ones.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

Semaphore-related random fail seems to be recently fixed. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/8f8d4b3292f8dd71bb41185936777cf6a17d4a96

As far as I know, it is cause by the low performance of the
auto-tester machine for the FreeBSD platform.
So this is not *semaphore related*, IMHO.

Kenji Hara

2012/7/2 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com>:
> On Monday, July 02, 2012 09:33:31 kenji hara wrote:
>> It seems to me that is randomly fails in Linux 64bit or 32/64bit platforms.
>>
>> core.exception.AssertError@core.sync.condition(618): Assertion failure http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?dataid=198029
>>
>> The results in Linux 64bit column are more red than others. http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/pulls.ghtml
>
> Yeah, I'm pretty sure that that's one of the tests that randomly fails. I believe that there's a semaphore-related one which fails sometimes on some set of platforms, but I don't know which ones.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

On Monday, July 02, 2012 10:07:17 kenji hara wrote:
> Semaphore-related random fail seems to be recently fixed. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/8f8d4b3292f8dd71bb 41185936777cf6a17d4a96

Good to know.

> As far as I know, it is cause by the low performance of the
> auto-tester machine for the FreeBSD platform.
> So this is not *semaphore related*, IMHO.

I wasn't suggesting that this particular failure was semaphore-related. I was just pointing out that there was another test which was failing randomly.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:07:17 +0200, kenji hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> wrote:

> Semaphore-related random fail seems to be recently fixed.
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/8f8d4b3292f8dd71bb41185936777cf6a17d4a96
>
> As far as I know, it is cause by the low performance of the
> auto-tester machine for the FreeBSD platform.
> So this is not *semaphore related*, IMHO.
>
> Kenji Hara
>

I think it's an artifact of the scheduler but that's just a guess.
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime