[Issue 282] New: Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue

Aug 11, 2006

d-bugmail

Aug 11, 2006

Derek Parnell

Aug 11, 2006

Aug 11, 2006

Aug 11, 2006

Sep 18, 2009

Dec 29, 2009

Dec 29, 2009

Dec 29, 2009

Dec 31, 2009

August 11, 2006

[Issue 282] New: Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue

Posted by d-bugmail

Permalink

d-bugmail

Permalink

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282

           Summary: Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue
           Product: D
           Version: 0.163
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: jarrett.billingsley@gmail.com


I really don't know what else to call this, and it's a bit tedious to get to happen.  So here's the general idea:

------ [modules/test1.d] --------

module modules.test1;
import modules.test2;

struct A
{
        enum B
        {
                One,
                Two
        }
}

void bar()
{
        foo();
}

--------- [modules/test2.d] ---------

module modules.test2;
import modules.test1;

A.B foobar; // error, no property B for type A?!

void foo()
{
        int x;

        if(x == A.B.One) // but this is OK
                x = 1;
}

---------------------------------

Some interesting facts:

- This only seems to happen if the modules are in a package.  If they're two top-level modules, it works fine.

- Notice I can't use A.B as a type, but I can in fact access A.B's members.

- Using static imports/aliased imports does not help.

I don't know how to get it to not work the way it does in MiniD - that is, I can't even use A.B in the same module that A.B is defined!

This is, for me, something of a showstopper.. I'll probably be using 0.162 for a bit, which is sad, considering how cool the 0.163 features are!  I don't know if I should change the priority of this bug, but this is something that can't be worked around easily, so I'd put it pretty high up there.


--

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:43:18 +0000 (UTC), d-bugmail@puremagic.com wrote: > This is, for me, something of a showstopper.. I'll probably be using 0.162 for a bit, which is sad, considering how cool the 0.163 features are! I don't know if I should change the priority of this bug, but this is something that can't be worked around easily, so I'd put it pretty high up there. It depends on the order that you compile the modules. This works... dmd -c modules\test2 modules\test1 This doesn't ... dmd -c modules\test1 modules\test2 -- Derek (skype: derek.j.parnell) Melbourne, Australia "Down with mediocrity!" 11/08/2006 3:02:17 PM

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 dawid.ciezarkiewicz@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dawid.ciezarkiewicz@gmail.co | |m ------- Comment #1 from dawid.ciezarkiewicz@gmail.com 2006-08-11 07:32 ------- Related to #204. Maybe even same problem. --

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 ------- Comment #2 from dawid.ciezarkiewicz@gmail.com 2006-08-11 07:33 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Related to #204. Maybe even same problem. > Err. #102 . Sorry. --

"Derek Parnell" <derek@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:17moo13ephs7r.19lhtzygw8iie$.dlg@40tude.net... > It depends on the order that you compile the modules. > > This works... > > dmd -c modules\test2 modules\test1 > > > This doesn't ... > > dmd -c modules\test1 modules\test2 Okay, here's something frustrating. That works, and I'm very happy about that. But if you include other modules on the commandline before the conflicting modules, such as: dmd -c modules\test3 modules\test2 modules\test1 It no longer works. But put that other module at the end, and it does. Tedious, but hopefully Walter will fix this. Very soon.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario@gmx.de> 2009-09-18 00:56:35 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=455) ensure semantic run when searching struct for members When searching members of a class that is not yet semantically analyzed, the analysis is run on it. This is not done for structs or unions, which is probably an omission. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2009-12-29 03:07:49 PST --- Changeset 318 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llucax@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> 2009-12-29 09:02:30 PST --- http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 --- Comment #6 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> 2009-12-29 09:02:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 Damn! http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/318 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2009-12-31 11:09:22 PST --- Fixed dmd 1.054 and 2.038 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Forums