previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.

I am a fedora packager ldc compiler and tango will be go in official fedora repo. People who want learn or advanced programmer can use Fedora for develop D application.
I put here a temporary link to béta src.rpm and spec file:
- http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/

Note:
if a mandriva or suse packager want adapt and push to official repo (follow changelog ;-) )

On 06/26/2010 07:07 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
> previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.
>
> I�am�a�fedora�packager�ldc�compiler�and�tango�will�be�go�in�official�fedora�repo.�People�who�want�learn�or�advanced�programmer�can�use�Fedora�for�develop�D�application.
> I�put�here�a�temporary�link�to�b�ta�src.rpm and spec file:
> - http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/
>
> Note:
> if�a�mandriva�or�suse�packager�want�adapt�and�push�to�official�repo�(follow�changelog�;-)�)

Nice.

When?

when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week

On 06/26/2010 08:43 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
> when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week

Cool

Hello bioinfornatics,

> previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better
> here.
> 
> ldc compiler and tango will be go in official fedora repo.

Great news, but why Tango and not also Phoboes?

-- 
... <IXOYE><

because not all is in open License, i read this: http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues

Hello bioinfornatics,

> because not all is in open License, i read this:
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
> 

Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but IIRC it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I do know that Walter has been careful to only put in code that can be freely used (if not fully open source).

-- 
... <IXOYE><

On Jun 26, 10 23:43, BCS wrote:
> Hello bioinfornatics,
>
>> because not all is in open License, i read this:
>> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
>>
>
> Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but
> IIRC it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I do know that
> Walter has been careful to only put in code that can be freely used (if
> not fully open source).
>

That's true for D2, but probably not for D1.

if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main

I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)

bioinfornatics, el 26 de junio a las 16:14 me escribiste:
> if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
> 
> I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)

LDC doesn't work with Phobos for D1 because it uses the Tango runtime. And it doesn't compile D2 either ATM. So it makes no sense to include Phobos 1 or 2 if the only D compiler provided by Fedora is LDC.

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mi mami llevo a tu papi con el fuquete! Menéalo! Mi mami llevo a tu
papi con el fuquete!
	-- Sidharta Kiwi