Hi, Walter, I don't know if you has been keeping an eye on bug 3463[1], but I would like very much to know if you are interested on integrating the patch to the compiler. It has suffered a few iterations and the current one seems good enough, and it's backwards compatible (you can compile a runtime, Tango or Phobos, that doesn't know anything about precise scanning using a precise-enabled compiler and all works just fine, which makes it a good candidate for D1 too).

I really don't care too much about the runtime patches right now, but I find the compiler patch quite important, as it enables a new field in GC research for D, with this patch it is possible to experiment even with moving collectors.

What do you think?

[1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pack and get dressed
before your father hears us,
before all hell breaks loose.

I haven't yet, but I will.

Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Hi, Walter, I don't know if you has been keeping an eye on bug 3463[1], but I would like very much to know if you are interested on integrating the patch to the compiler. It has suffered a few iterations and the current one seems good enough, and it's backwards compatible (you can compile a runtime, Tango or Phobos, that doesn't know anything about precise scanning using a precise-enabled compiler and all works just fine, which makes it a good candidate for D1 too).
>
> I really don't care too much about the runtime patches right now, but I find the compiler patch quite important, as it enables a new field in GC research for D, with this patch it is possible to experiment even with moving collectors.
>
> What do you think?
>
> [1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
>
>