dmd commit, revision 791


user: walter

msg:
bugzilla 5238 PATCH: fix return of uninitialised var in interpret.c

http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/791

Walter, normally you close bugs after fixing, but didn't in this case.  I just checked in the test case changes that were part of the bug report.  Is there anything left to fix?

Later,
Brad

On 12/7/2010 3:19 PM, dsource.org wrote:
> dmd commit, revision 791
> 
> 
> user: walter
> 
> msg:
> bugzilla 5238 PATCH: fix return of uninitialised var in interpret.c
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/791
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals

I didn't because I didn't understand that bug report (neither did Don!).

Brad Roberts wrote:
> Walter, normally you close bugs after fixing, but didn't in this case.  I just checked in the test case changes that were part of the bug report.  Is there anything left to fix?
>
> Later,
> Brad
>
> On 12/7/2010 3:19 PM, dsource.org wrote:
> 
>> dmd commit, revision 791
>>
>>
>> user: walter
>>
>> msg:
>> bugzilla 5238 PATCH: fix return of uninitialised var in interpret.c
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/791
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-internals mailing list
>> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>
>
> 

Um... ok.  And where did you express that lack of understanding so that maybe it could be cleared up?  I'm flabbergasted at this sort of response.

On 12/8/2010 11:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> I didn't because I didn't understand that bug report (neither did Don!).
> 
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Walter, normally you close bugs after fixing, but didn't in this case.  I just checked in the test case changes that were part of the bug report.  Is there anything left to fix?
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
>>
>> On 12/7/2010 3:19 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>> 
>>> dmd commit, revision 791
>>>
>>>
>>> user: walter
>>>
>>> msg:
>>> bugzilla 5238 PATCH: fix return of uninitialised var in interpret.c
>>>
>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/791

I figured I'd worry about it later. I'm juggling about half a dozen things right now. That's why I did not mark it as resolved.

Brad Roberts wrote:
> Um... ok.  And where did you express that lack of understanding so that maybe it could be cleared up?  I'm flabbergasted at this sort of response.
>
> On 12/8/2010 11:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> I didn't because I didn't understand that bug report (neither did Don!).
>>
>> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> 
>>> Walter, normally you close bugs after fixing, but didn't in this case.  I just checked in the test case changes that were part of the bug report.  Is there anything left to fix?
>>>
>>> Later,
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> On 12/7/2010 3:19 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> dmd commit, revision 791
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> user: walter
>>>>
>>>> msg:
>>>> bugzilla 5238 PATCH: fix return of uninitialised var in interpret.c
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/791
>>>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>
>
>