Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 29, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex <andrei at erdani.com> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011) Changed paths: M posix.mak Log Message: ----------- Updated website-related build |
January 29, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to noreply at github.com | On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>
> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex <andrei at erdani.com>
> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>
> Changed paths:
> M posix.mak
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Updated website-related build
I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of complaining about files which don't exist?
Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
# Set DDOC, the documentation generator
ifeq ($(OS),linux)
DDOC=dmd
else
DDOC=dmd
endif
I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
January 30, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis | I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in d-programming-language.org. Let me actually post to digitalmars.D.
I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
Andrei
On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>
>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<andrei at erdani.com>
>> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>
>> Changed paths:
>> M posix.mak
>>
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Updated website-related build
>
> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of complaining about files which don't exist?
>
> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>
> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
> DDOC=dmd
> else
> DDOC=dmd
> endif
>
> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
January 30, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing ../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable. I'd prefer it if it was more standalone. The d-p-l build should instead be pulling from subordinate packages (druntime, phobos).
Thoughts?
Later,
Brad
On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in d-programming-language.org. Let me actually post to digitalmars.D.
>
> I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
>
>
> Andrei
>
> On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
>>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>>> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>>
>>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>>
>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<andrei at erdani.com>
>>> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>>
>>> Changed paths:
>>> M posix.mak
>>>
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> Updated website-related build
>>
>> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of complaining about files which don't exist?
>>
>> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>>
>> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
>> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
>> DDOC=dmd
>> else
>> DDOC=dmd
>> endif
>>
>> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
January 30, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | That scheme would be fine. But I think it's easier and less redundant to allow phobos and druntime build their own documentation (under d-programming-language.org's coordination) instead of putting that code inside d-programming-language.org's makefile.
Andrei
On 01/30/2011 02:51 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing ../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable. I'd prefer it if it was more standalone. The d-p-l build should instead be pulling from subordinate packages (druntime, phobos).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Later,
> Brad
>
> On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in d-programming-language.org. Let me actually post to digitalmars.D.
>>
>> I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
>>>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>>>> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>>>
>>>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>>>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<andrei at erdani.com>
>>>> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>>>
>>>> Changed paths:
>>>> M posix.mak
>>>>
>>>> Log Message:
>>>> -----------
>>>> Updated website-related build
>>>
>>> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of complaining about files which don't exist?
>>>
>>> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>>>
>>> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
>>> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
>>> DDOC=dmd
>>> else
>>> DDOC=dmd
>>> endif
>>>
>>> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>>>
>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
January 30, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] 0c6b3e: Updated website-related build | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | I didn't mean that phobos and druntime shouldn't build their docs. They just shouldn't be depending on directories or anything else outside their own tree.
On 1/30/2011 9:56 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> That scheme would be fine. But I think it's easier and less redundant to allow phobos and druntime build their own documentation (under d-programming-language.org's coordination) instead of putting that code inside d-programming-language.org's makefile.
>
> Andrei
>
> On 01/30/2011 02:51 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing ../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable. I'd prefer it if it was more standalone. The d-p-l build should instead be pulling from subordinate packages (druntime, phobos).
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
>>
>> On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in d-programming-language.org. Let me actually post to digitalmars.D.
>>>
>>> I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 noreply at github.com wrote:
>>>>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>>>>> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>>>>
>>>>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>>>>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<andrei at erdani.com>
>>>>> Date: 2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>>>>
>>>>> Changed paths:
>>>>> M posix.mak
>>>>>
>>>>> Log Message:
>>>>> -----------
>>>>> Updated website-related build
>>>>
>>>> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of complaining about files which don't exist?
>>>>
>>>> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>>>>
>>>> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
>>>> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
>>>> DDOC=dmd
>>>> else
>>>> DDOC=dmd
>>>> endif
>>>>
>>>> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the same thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>>>>
>>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> phobos mailing list
>>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation