Are the docs on www.d-programming-language.org supposed to be the latest from git instead of those from the release of 2.051? In the long run, I would assume that they'd be from the latest released as opposed to the master branch in the git repository, though I don't know what's intended for the moment. Regardless, it appears that it's currently showing the latest git versions of the docs, which has thrown at least one person off who posted about it on the main list, and there are probably more who haven't posted.

- Jonathan M Davis

On 2/6/11 5:42 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Are the docs on www.d-programming-language.org supposed to be the latest from git instead of those from the release of 2.051?

No.

Andrei

On Sunday 06 February 2011 16:44:13 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/6/11 5:42 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Are the docs on www.d-programming-language.org supposed to be the latest from git instead of those from the release of 2.051?

Well, you're going to need to fix that then, since it _is_ currently showing the latest git version (or at least a recent one), not 2.051.

- Jonathan M Davis

I meant the content right now is experimental and may update without notice. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Andrei

On 2/6/11 7:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Sunday 06 February 2011 16:44:13 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 2/6/11 5:42 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> Are the docs on www.d-programming-language.org supposed to be the latest from git instead of those from the release of 2.051?
>
> Well, you're going to need to fix that then, since it _is_ currently showing the latest git version (or at least a recent one), not 2.051.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

On Sunday 06 February 2011 18:00:43 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I meant the content right now is experimental and may update without notice. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Well, some folks misunderstood that it seems and started using it as their place for looking up the documenattion. I was surprised to find out that it was even there, since last time I'd checked, it wasn't. And given the switch from svn to git, it wouldn't surprise me if it were a bit of a pain to get the new website to have the old documentation anyway.

- Jonathan M Davis