Thread overview
[phobos] The move notice in std.string
Jul 15, 2012
Jonathan M Davis
July 15, 2012
Hi,

See: http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html

Do we still need to keep that notice around? It's been a long time since these symbols were moved and I haven't encountered any code in the wild that still relies on them.

Regards,
Alex
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

July 15, 2012
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:55:27 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> See: http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html
> 
> Do we still need to keep that notice around? It's been a long time since these symbols were moved and I haven't encountered any code in the wild that still relies on them.

No, I think that that can be removed. There are some related code changes that need to be made as well (primarily public imports which should be removed), but when I went to do them earlier, it broke the dmd tests, and I haven't gotten back to it yet - though the list of deprecations and removals for this release is getting long enough (due to the delayed release) that I'm starting to be tempted to delay some of them by a release. We really should look at doing a release soon.

But if you want to, you can remove the notice, and I can sort out the related code changes later.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
July 15, 2012
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:55:27 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> See: http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html
>>
>> Do we still need to keep that notice around? It's been a long time since these symbols were moved and I haven't encountered any code in the wild that still relies on them.
>
> No, I think that that can be removed. There are some related code changes that need to be made as well (primarily public imports which should be removed), but when I went to do them earlier, it broke the dmd tests, and I haven't gotten back to it yet - though the list of deprecations and removals for this release is getting long enough (due to the delayed release) that I'm starting to be tempted to delay some of them by a release. We really should look at doing a release soon.

Yes... yes we should. It's been way too long.

>
> But if you want to, you can remove the notice, and I can sort out the related code changes later.

I'm fine with waiting until the next release if we want to keep the deprecation list reasonable.

Regards,
Alex
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos