"Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3D18BEE7.8EAA075D@smartsoft.cc...
| Andrew Edwards wrote:
|
| > That does it Jan. Thanks.
|
| Still means one of the other things have not quite been setup correctly.

:-( that's not good! Thought I followed the intructions in the readme file to the letter!  Is there anything I should EXPLICITY check or modify before I run into other problems?

Are there any known *bugs* with running this compiler on a WinXP system, if so where might I look to find additional information on such topics?

Andrew

Andrew Edwards wrote:

> "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
> news:3D18BEE7.8EAA075D@smartsoft.cc...
> | Andrew Edwards wrote:
> |
> | > That does it Jan. Thanks.
> |
> | Still means one of the other things have not quite been setup correctly.
>
> :-( that's not good! Thought I followed the intructions in the readme file to the letter!  Is there anything I should EXPLICITY check or modify before I run into other problems?

Well if this
INCLUDE="%@P%\..\include";"%@P%\..\mfc\include";"%@P%\stl";%INCLUDE%
is in your sc.ini in e:\dm\bin and the compiler (sc.exe) is in the same
directory something is wrong.
It should have found the include files.

> Are there any known *bugs* with running this compiler on a WinXP system, if so where might I look to find additional information on such topics?

No. I run it all day every day on XP...
newsgroup(s) is the best support area.

Jan

"Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3D18CF2A.A109E724@smartsoft.cc...
|
| Well if this
| INCLUDE="%@P%\..\include";"%@P%\..\mfc\include";"%@P%\stl";%INCLUDE%
| is in your sc.ini in e:\dm\bin and the compiler (sc.exe) is in the same
| directory something is wrong.
| It should have found the include files.

I agree, but am not sure what the problem is and, since I spent two days trying to get this and several compilers to work after BC++ v5.5 gave up on me, I'm inclined to accept and be happy with it.  Anyhoo DMC++ is way faster than BC++! Except for having to reconfigure my source to operate at school, I'd just assume I've landed in heaven! *Again* Just hope I don't get too comfortable too soon!

Because:

            *- DMD Rocks!!!*
            Leave two cheers for Compiler Walter!
            If you build it! They will come.

Andrew!

Andrew Edwards wrote:

> I agree, but am not sure what the problem is and, since I spent two days trying to get this and several compilers to work after BC++ v5.5 gave up on me, I'm inclined to accept and be happy with it.

OK, it's not on my system <g>

> Anyhoo DMC++ is way faster than BC++! Except for having to reconfigure my
> source to operate at
> school, I'd just assume I've landed in heaven!

You're kidding!

> *Again* Just hope I don't get too comfortable too soon!

<g>

Jan