Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 11, 2003 DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Matthew Wilson has written an article for CUJ which does some performance comparisons for various C++ compilers at http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/. Of special interest is this chart http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/wilson_f2.htm. |
December 12, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Congratulations Walter! Phill. "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:braq3g$2vtn$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Matthew Wilson has written an article for CUJ which does some performance comparisons for various C++ compilers at http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/. Of special interest is this chart http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/wilson_f2.htm. > > |
December 12, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | I've already seen another comparison table about performance (on dm site I think). But I found that with the METAKIT library, digitalmars executable is 3 times slower than VC5 !! search in 50000 records database with vc5 : 24.931111 ms/search search in 50000 records database with dm8.38: 65.156000 ms/search and this is a problem particularly because I use the metakit library for quick searches... Walter wrote: > Matthew Wilson has written an article for CUJ which does some performance > comparisons for various C++ compilers at > http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/. Of special interest > is this chart > http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/wilson_f2.htm. > > -- Riccardo Cohen Articque Les Roches 37230 Fondettes France web = http://www.articque.com tel: +33 02 47 49 90 49 fax: +33 02 47 49 91 49 |
December 12, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Riccardo Cohen | Which version of the compiler was it? 8.38 brought in some significant improvements in the template optimisation "Riccardo Cohen" <rcohen@articque.com> wrote in message news:3FD9963F.60008@articque.com... > I've already seen another comparison table about performance (on dm site I think). But I found that > with the METAKIT library, digitalmars executable is 3 times slower than VC5 !! > > search in 50000 records database with vc5 : 24.931111 ms/search search in 50000 records database with dm8.38: 65.156000 ms/search > > and this is a problem particularly because I use the metakit library for quick searches... > > Walter wrote: > > > Matthew Wilson has written an article for CUJ which does some performance > > comparisons for various C++ compilers at http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/. Of special interest > > is this chart http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/wilson_f2.htm. > > > > > > -- > Riccardo Cohen > > Articque > Les Roches > 37230 Fondettes > France > web = http://www.articque.com > tel: +33 02 47 49 90 49 > fax: +33 02 47 49 91 49 > |
December 12, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew Wilson | I used 8.38. I checked by typing ...dm\bin\dmc.exe : Digital Mars Compiler Version 8.38n Copyright (C) Digital Mars 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved. Matthew Wilson wrote: > Which version of the compiler was it? 8.38 brought in some significant > improvements in the template optimisation > > "Riccardo Cohen" <rcohen@articque.com> wrote in message > news:3FD9963F.60008@articque.com... > >>I've already seen another comparison table about performance (on dm site I > > think). But I found that > >>with the METAKIT library, digitalmars executable is 3 times slower than > > VC5 !! > >>search in 50000 records database with vc5 : 24.931111 ms/search >>search in 50000 records database with dm8.38: 65.156000 ms/search >> >>and this is a problem particularly because I use the metakit library for > > quick searches... > >>Walter wrote: >> >> >>>Matthew Wilson has written an article for CUJ which does some > > performance > >>>comparisons for various C++ compilers at >>>http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/. Of special > > interest > >>>is this chart >>>http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8943/cujexp0312wilson/wilson_f2.htm. >>> >>> >> >>-- >>Riccardo Cohen >> >>Articque >>Les Roches >>37230 Fondettes >>France >>web = http://www.articque.com >>tel: +33 02 47 49 90 49 >>fax: +33 02 47 49 91 49 >> > > > -- Riccardo Cohen Articque Les Roches 37230 Fondettes France web = http://www.articque.com tel: +33 02 47 49 90 49 fax: +33 02 47 49 91 49 |
December 12, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew Wilson | "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in news:brc5j6$1ta8$1@digitaldaemon.com: > Which version of the compiler was it? BTW, Matthew, afaik there is nothing like Watcom 12.0 listed in your article. There is Open Watcom 1.0 and 1.1 (1.2 RC for braves). They internally have __WATCOMC__ predefined with value adjusted to mark continuation of development but using it for naming whole product is like calling DMC Symantec C++ just because it has __SC__ predefined. Any chance for such interesting article about strong FPU/double operations? ABX |
December 16, 2003 Re: DMC++ 8.38 performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to W³odzimierz Skiba | > > Which version of the compiler was it? > > BTW, Matthew, afaik there is nothing like Watcom 12.0 listed in your article. There is Open Watcom 1.0 and 1.1 (1.2 RC for braves). They internally have __WATCOMC__ predefined with value adjusted to mark continuation of development but using it for naming whole product is like calling DMC Symantec C++ just because it has __SC__ predefined. I'm still stuck in the old Watcom mode. I should start talking about OW 1.0 etc. Please feel free to point it out if I do it again. :) > Any chance for such interesting article about strong FPU/double operations? There is a strong chance, once I'm past the book deadline (2nd Feb). By all means write to me again after that time and remind me Cheers Matthew |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation