The patches below all seem to be ready for inclusion in the next compiler release. They're not too complicated.

PATCHES: Critical (regression, ICE, wrong code, missing line number)
3737 SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad opDispatch
3491 typeof( (string[string]).init)) == AssociativeArray!(string,
string), doesn't implicitly convert to string[string].
3306 bad function/delegate literal generated into header files
2463 No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning

PATCHES: Non-critical
2321 spec on inline asm can be misunderstood
3373 bad codeview debug info for long and ulong
3450 incorrect result for is (typeof({ ... }())) inside a struct
3029 Bug in array value mangling rule
?(For 3029, use the patch in the last comment).

ok, these are done. Thanks, Don!

Don Clugston wrote:
> The patches below all seem to be ready for inclusion in the next compiler release. They're not too complicated.
>
> PATCHES: Critical (regression, ICE, wrong code, missing line number)
> 3737 SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad opDispatch
> 3491 typeof( (string[string]).init)) == AssociativeArray!(string,
> string), doesn't implicitly convert to string[string].
> 3306 bad function/delegate literal generated into header files
> 2463 No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning
>
> PATCHES: Non-critical
> 2321 spec on inline asm can be misunderstood
> 3373 bad codeview debug info for long and ulong
> 3450 incorrect result for is (typeof({ ... }())) inside a struct
> 3029 Bug in array value mangling rule
>  (For 3029, use the patch in the last comment).
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>
>
> 

> ok, these are done. Thanks, Don!
>
> Don Clugston wrote:
>> The patches below all seem to be ready for inclusion in the next compiler release. They're not too complicated.
>>

This patch is also quite simple and could be integrated:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2997
(if the usecase I've given there is valid)

In fact it only adds parsing the interface members but since it must be done recursively it's put into a helper function.