Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 05, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi list, This post is my first post at Phobos ML :) I have one question about hasLength. Current implementation from std.range: ----- template hasLength(R) { enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) && !isNarrowString!R; } ----- This implementation has following issues. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508 But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property. We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as @property? If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete. |
May 04, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Masahiro Nakagawa | I think the length should be a property.
Andrei
Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
>
> I have one question about hasLength.
>
> Current implementation from std.range:
> -----
> template hasLength(R)
> {
> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
> !isNarrowString!R;
> }
> -----
> This implementation has following issues.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
>
> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
>
> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
> @property?
> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
May 04, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Length should be a property. When I filed my initial bug report, there was no such thing as @property. If that fixes this bug, them IMHO it's fixed. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>wrote: > I think the length should be a property. > > Andrei > > > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :) >> >> I have one question about hasLength. >> >> Current implementation from std.range: >> ----- >> template hasLength(R) >> { >> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) && >> !isNarrowString!R; >> } >> ----- >> This implementation has following issues. >> >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508 >> >> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property. >> >> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as >> @property? >> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete. >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> phobos at puremagic.com >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >> > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > phobos at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20100504/96009068/attachment.html> |
May 05, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property. Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> I think the length should be a property.
>
> Andrei
>
> Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
>> I have one question about hasLength.
>> Current implementation from std.range:
>> -----
>> template hasLength(R)
>> {
>> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
>> !isNarrowString!R;
>> }
>> -----
>> This implementation has following issues.
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
>> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
>> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
>> @property?
>> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
|
May 05, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Simcha | Oh, I forgot D's history...
On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:31:51 +0900, David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com> wrote:
> Length should be a property. When I filed my initial bug report, there
> was
> no such thing as @property. If that fixes this bug, them IMHO it's
> fixed.
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>wrote:
>
>> I think the length should be a property.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>
>> Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
>>>
>>> I have one question about hasLength.
>>>
>>> Current implementation from std.range:
>>> -----
>>> template hasLength(R)
>>> {
>>> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
>>> !isNarrowString!R;
>>> }
>>> -----
>>> This implementation has following issues.
>>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
>>>
>>> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
>>>
>>> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
>>> @property?
>>> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
>>> _______________________________________________
|
May 04, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Masahiro Nakagawa | It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many places in which we don't use @property but we must.
Andrei
Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property. Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
>
>
> On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the length should be a property.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
>>> I have one question about hasLength.
>>> Current implementation from std.range:
>>> -----
>>> template hasLength(R)
>>> {
>>> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
>>> !isNarrowString!R;
>>> }
>>> -----
>>> This implementation has following issues.
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
>>> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
>>> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
>>> @property?
>>> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
May 05, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1495 Committed. On Wed, 05 May 2010 06:32:46 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote: > It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many places in which we don't use @property but we must. > > Andrei > > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: >> I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property. >> Is this a bug? If so, I will commit. >> On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu >> <andrei at erdani.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the length should be a property. >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: >>>> Hi list, >>>> This post is my first post at Phobos ML :) >>>> I have one question about hasLength. >>>> Current implementation from std.range: >>>> ----- >>>> template hasLength(R) >>>> { >>>> enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) && >>>> !isNarrowString!R; >>>> } >>>> ----- >>>> This implementation has following issues. >>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 >>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508 >>>> But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as >>>> @property. >>>> We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as >>>> @property? >>>> If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete. >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> phobos at puremagic.com >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > phobos at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos |
May 04, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Masahiro Nakagawa | Don't forget to update the changelog, noting the issue number if there is one. They're located in the phobos project.
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:06:56 +0900
> From: Masahiro Nakagawa <repeatedly at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> Subject: Re: [phobos] length implementation for Range
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1495 Committed.
>
>
> On Wed, 05 May 2010 06:32:46 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
>
> > It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many places in which we don't use @property but we must.
> >
> > Andrei
> >
> > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> > > I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property.
> > > Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
> > > On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
> > > <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the length should be a property.
> > > >
> > > > Andrei
> > > >
> > > > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> > > > > Hi list,
> > > > > This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
> > > > > I have one question about hasLength.
> > > > > Current implementation from std.range:
> > > > > -----
> > > > > template hasLength(R)
> > > > > {
> > > > > enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
> > > > > !isNarrowString!R;
> > > > > }
> > > > > -----
> > > > > This implementation has following issues.
> > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
> > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
> > > > > But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
> > > > > We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
> > > > > @property?
> > > > > If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > phobos mailing list
> > > phobos at puremagic.com
> > > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> > _______________________________________________
> > phobos mailing list
> > phobos at puremagic.com
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
May 05, 2010 [phobos] length implementation for Range | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | Thanks for your advice.
changeset 1495 isn't bug fixing, so I listed the summery at the WHATSNEW section.
On Wed, 05 May 2010 08:17:11 +0900, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> Don't forget to update the changelog, noting the issue number if there is one. They're located in the phobos project.
>
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:06:56 +0900
>> From: Masahiro Nakagawa <repeatedly at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
>> To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
>> Subject: Re: [phobos] length implementation for Range
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1495 Committed.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 05 May 2010 06:32:46 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> <andrei at erdani.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many
>> places in
>> > which we don't use @property but we must.
>> >
>> > Andrei
>> >
>> > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>> > > I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a
>> property.
>> > > Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
>> > > On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> > > <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I think the length should be a property.
>> > > >
>> > > > Andrei
>> > > >
>> > > > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
>> > > > > Hi list,
>> > > > > This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
>> > > > > I have one question about hasLength.
>> > > > > Current implementation from std.range:
>> > > > > -----
>> > > > > template hasLength(R)
>> > > > > {
>> > > > > enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
>> > > > > !isNarrowString!R;
>> > > > > }
>> > > > > -----
>> > > > > This implementation has following issues.
>> > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
>> > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
>> > > > > But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as
>> @property.
>> > > > > We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked
>> as
>> > > > > @property?
>> > > > > If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation