Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 15, 2010 [phobos] Why OS 'posix' for Linux but 'osx' for OSX and 'freebsd' for FreeBSD in Makefile? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
The subject says it all. Now that we have a unified makefile, what's the point of different target directories for each platform? If we really have to go this route, can the target directory for linux be 'linux'? As things stand, Linux is the only OS Brad's test suite runs against because of this issue. |
September 15, 2010 [phobos] Why OS 'posix' for Linux but 'osx' for OSX and 'freebsd' for FreeBSD in Makefile? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | Good point! I'll look into fixing that. The makefile should stay "posix.mak" but each OS generating different binaries should get a different directory, named after the OS. Right?
Andrei
On 9/15/10 18:23 CDT, Sean Kelly wrote:
> The subject says it all. Now that we have a unified makefile, what's the point of different target directories for each platform? If we really have to go this route, can the target directory for linux be 'linux'? As things stand, Linux is the only OS Brad's test suite runs against because of this issue.
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
September 15, 2010 [phobos] Why OS 'posix' for Linux but 'osx' for OSX and 'freebsd' for FreeBSD in Makefile? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Yeah.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> Good point! I'll look into fixing that. The makefile should stay "posix.mak" but each OS generating different binaries should get a different directory, named after the OS. Right?
>
> Andrei
>
> On 9/15/10 18:23 CDT, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> The subject says it all. Now that we have a unified makefile, what's the point of different target directories for each platform? If we really have to go this route, can the target directory for linux be 'linux'? As things stand, Linux is the only OS Brad's test suite runs against because of this issue.
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
September 16, 2010 [phobos] Why OS 'posix' for Linux but 'osx' for OSX and 'freebsd' for FreeBSD in Makefile? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | Done, revision 2010.
Andrei
On 09/15/2010 06:23 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> The subject says it all. Now that we have a unified makefile, what's the point of different target directories for each platform? If we really have to go this route, can the target directory for linux be 'linux'? As things stand, Linux is the only OS Brad's test suite runs against because of this issue.
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation