December 20, 2010 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stephan Dilly | Fixed. Sorry 'bout that.
Stephan Dilly wrote:
> Are you sure you uploaded a new archive, i get all the same errors still. even with my posted test case on this mailing list. Even the win32 dmd binary in it dates 15th of Dec
>
> On 20.12.2010 09:32, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>> This should fix Stephan Dilly's issue.
>>
>
|
December 20, 2010 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Ah seems to be working. Does the testsuit make builds like this (-release -inline -noboundscheck) so that adding my testcase as some kind of automated test would prevent that one from creeping back in sometime again ?
I am all set for a release now :D
Cheers
On 20.12.2010 21:03, Walter Bright wrote:
> Fixed. Sorry 'bout that.
>
> Stephan Dilly wrote:
>> Are you sure you uploaded a new archive, i get all the same errors still. even with my posted test case on this mailing list. Even the win32 dmd binary in it dates 15th of Dec
>>
>> On 20.12.2010 09:32, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>
>>> This should fix Stephan Dilly's issue.
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
|
December 20, 2010 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stephan Dilly | That test case is, of course, in the test suite now.
Stephan Dilly wrote:
> Ah seems to be working. Does the testsuit make builds like this (-release -inline -noboundscheck) so that adding my testcase as some kind of automated test would prevent that one from creeping back in sometime again ?
>
> I am all set for a release now :D
>
|
December 21, 2010 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Both D1 and D2 pass all my tests now.
On 20 December 2010 21:03, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Fixed. Sorry 'bout that.
>
> Stephan Dilly wrote:
>>
>> Are you sure you uploaded a new archive, i get all the same errors still. even with my posted test case on this mailing list. Even the win32 dmd binary in it dates 15th of Dec
>>
>> On 20.12.2010 09:32, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>
>>> This should fix Stephan Dilly's issue.
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
|
December 21, 2010 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston |
Don Clugston wrote:
> Both D1 and D2 pass all my tests now.
>
>
Thanks! Posted the release.
|
January 02, 2011 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | It would appear that this change breaks this book example: http://www.erdani.com/tdpl/code/shouldwork/f0650_error_handling_00007.d Andrei On 12/15/10 10:35 AM, Sean Kelly wrote: > On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Don Clugston wrote: > >> On 15 December 2010 10:38, Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com> wrote: >>> Tip from Brad got it working. >>> >>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip >> >> I found some minor issues with the ddoc for druntime. I've fixed them in svn. Also, html/phobos/std_iterator.html should be deleted from the download. >> >> These fixes only affect the documentation. > > Can you explain the change on line 172 of core.atomic? Is that really correct? > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
January 02, 2011 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Which change, exactly? One of the many between 2.050 and 2.051?
On 1/2/2011 9:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> It would appear that this change breaks this book example:
>
> http://www.erdani.com/tdpl/code/shouldwork/f0650_error_handling_00007.d
>
>
> Andrei
>
> On 12/15/10 10:35 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 December 2010 10:38, Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>>> Tip from Brad got it working.
>>>>
>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>
>>> I found some minor issues with the ddoc for druntime. I've fixed them in svn. Also, html/phobos/std_iterator.html should be deleted from the download.
>>>
>>> These fixes only affect the documentation.
>>
>> Can you explain the change on line 172 of core.atomic? Is that really correct?
>>
|
January 02, 2011 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | I was following a tip from Sean, but apparently not the right one. Sean?
Andrei
On 1/2/11 12:19 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Which change, exactly? One of the many between 2.050 and 2.051?
>
> On 1/2/2011 9:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> It would appear that this change breaks this book example:
>>
>> http://www.erdani.com/tdpl/code/shouldwork/f0650_error_handling_00007.d
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On 12/15/10 10:35 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15 December 2010 10:38, Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>>>> Tip from Brad got it working.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>>
>>>> I found some minor issues with the ddoc for druntime. I've fixed them in svn. Also, html/phobos/std_iterator.html should be deleted from the download.
>>>>
>>>> These fixes only affect the documentation.
>>>
>>> Can you explain the change on line 172 of core.atomic? Is that really correct?
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
|
January 14, 2011 [dmd-beta] dmd 2.051 beta | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | The was an older change where Walter reverted some of the collateral chaining code, but that was pre-2.051. If you're thinking of something else, I'll need a bigger hint.
On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I was following a tip from Sean, but apparently not the right one. Sean?
>
> Andrei
>
> On 1/2/11 12:19 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Which change, exactly? One of the many between 2.050 and 2.051?
>>
>> On 1/2/2011 9:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> It would appear that this change breaks this book example:
>>>
>>> http://www.erdani.com/tdpl/code/shouldwork/f0650_error_handling_00007.d
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> On 12/15/10 10:35 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>>> On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 15 December 2010 10:38, Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Tip from Brad got it working.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> I found some minor issues with the ddoc for druntime. I've fixed them in svn. Also, html/phobos/std_iterator.html should be deleted from the download.
>>>>>
>>>>> These fixes only affect the documentation.
>>>>
>>>> Can you explain the change on line 172 of core.atomic? Is that really correct?
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation